172
submitted 1 month ago by TheWaterGod@lemmy.ca to c/offbeat@lemmy.ca

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/Itw5D

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

If the piece designed to make you think about it then it's art. That's the only requirement. It can take as little or as much effort as the artist wants. There is not effort, cost, or material requirement for art. Yeah, just throwing cans on the ground isn't art, but if you place cans in a way to make someone consider the thoughtlessness or waste of society, that's art.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

So, if I randomly find an empty beer can two meters from a trash can, and think about the lazy person who probably threw it there, is it art? If he did it for the sake of art and I had a though about it, is it art if I am not aware of it?

Art is just dumb, give me back my paintings and sculptures.

[-] weker01@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes to both questions.

Edit: I think the problem is that many think that art must have intrinsic value. Well I disagree. Art can be trashy but still art.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
172 points (96.2% liked)

Offbeat

1285 readers
26 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS