316

Israeli troops fire on Unifil positions in south Lebanon region where Irish troops based (www.irishtimes.com)

submitted 6 days ago by mannycalavera@feddit.uk to c/world@lemmy.world

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I wonder what "Irish American Zionist" Joe Biden thinks of this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago

Not as long as papa US keeps protecting these douchebags

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

I think you are mistaking which one in this relationship calls the other "daddy."

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Let's hope "Mama U.S." flips the script immediately upon inauguration. I have heard she does not agree with Biden's position on this at all, but needs to play along for appearances and for that critical AIPAC money.

That AIPAC money is only critical in election season, which ends soon. I'll cross my fingers, but I won't hold my breath.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 days ago

Same level of delusion as the people who thought Trump would drain the swamp

[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

Kamala? The one promising to make the US the most lethal armed forces in the world? She's going to rein in Israel?

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

That's literally cope 101. She has shown on multiple occasions that she doesn't give a shit about Palestinians. She is as pro genocide as Biden is.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago

AIPAC has been messing in democratic primaires to make sure nobody critical of Israel is left in Congress. Even if electeds aren't actual Zionist believers, they'll go along to keep their jobs.

[-] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately even if she wins and wanted to restrain Israel, AIPAC money could still be spent against Democrats in the midterms.

Support for Israel is going to have to become much more unpopular with voters before we see real action from politicians.

This article describes how Israel's favorability has gone down globally but in the US it had only taken a very small hit last year. As the genocide as progressed and the war widened, maybe that favorability has taken more of a hit.

Time Israel's Favorability

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 2 points 5 days ago

And no matter which candidate you get, they'll stay the same.

So what does that mean and what does the American do about it? Because we are fractured lazy and overworked and many of us are got by fake news because an abusive system abused us and then neglected us now we're all shitheads

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Buy a gun, join a lefty militia, train up, then protest with your guns in large groups. If that method can convince Republicans to vote in favor of gun control to stop black people from having agency, it can work with anything you want to be changed as well.

People always respond to threats of violence, with fear or with retaliation.

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 5 points 5 days ago

If you raise any force of violence enough then government will come down on you regardless of who you are from Waco to MOVE. A government just has a monopoly on violence and the US has the monopoly of violence in the world

I'm not saying give up but the idea of the armed overthrow is not the best idea. Especially at this stage in the issue

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens engaging in armed protest would be impossible to address the way the Koresh or Ruby Ridge scenarios were handled.

Their response would need to be smart and nuanced and would need to address core issues to really make it stop.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 points 5 days ago

I didn't say overthrow, I said protest.

Where did you get the idea that armed protests always result in that?

Armed protests simply prevents cops and authorities to quell your voice. Then you can have a seat at their table and eat their lunch, so to speak.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

? I think you may be responding to the wrong comment.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 points 5 days ago

You are correct and smart. I am a silly person and indeed replied to the wrong person.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Lol thank you, but I am definitely not smart!

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024

316 points (94.6% liked)

World News

38824 readers

1965 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.