425
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Not arbitrarily though. If they are going to choose to ignore precedent then they have to provide a reasonable justification. E.g. the legal precedent is very old and is not fit for purpose in the modern era, or, the specifics of the case are different enough from the specifics of the precedent that It is possible to argue that it does not apply.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, is that how they overturned roe v wade?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It also helped the US supreme court basically doesn't do its job anymore. Had the justice system worked as intended it would have been quite difficult to justify overturning it. It's not like anything new had happened or any new evidence had come to light.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
425 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58698 readers
4042 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS