96
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They already proven twice it is not the case, they hit what they wanted to hit. Why do you people always have to take the US wars modus operandi as a standard, where an attack needs to wreck everything and kill as many civilians as possible? When is the attack "damaging", when it's doubletapping the rescuers?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -4 points 1 month ago

They hit (some of) what they wanted to hit, but didn't inflect significant damage. Which is why a preemptive strike would be meaningless; those only matter when they can seriously reduce the enemy's ability to wage war. Iran simply doesn't have anything that can seriously reduce Israel's ability to wage war in one attack.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
96 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32372 readers
620 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS