153

I shouldn't have to say this on a """communist""" forum, but here we are. Calling for unlimited genocide on the first world (lmao point out the "first world" on a map, I'll wait) is obviously reactionary on top of being idealist.

The idea that anything can be "unlimited" is pure capitalist decadence based on its foundational need for unlimited growth.

Any real socialist should be calling for a genocide that has its resources planned and allocated by a People's Genocide Committee and is then executed over five years. The genocide would be limited in both resource and geography, and thus, be a materialist genocide.

Or, even better, they might consider a means-tested genocide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 42 points 3 weeks ago

Bit post, but we actually did do this struggle session right? I stopped saying it...

[-] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago

Yes and the consensus was generally to stop using it yeah.

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

yea couldn't disagree

load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
153 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13511 readers
1144 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS