518
submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

[laughs in hypersonic missile]

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That would be MAD. Unless they're loaded with conventional warheads, in which case they'll run out pretty early on because those missiles are expensive and the US has bottomless supplies to reply with.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"the USA, where neoliberal capitalism has hollowed out the defense contractors so much they can't produce anywhere near enough artillery shells, has bottomless supplies and can afford more aircraft carriers than China can afford hypersonic missiles, which the USA has not even been able to successfully test."

pathetic cope

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

No, they just need to afford more missiles with a similar range. Aircraft carriers might prove to be the new battleships, but that's not the whole US military.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

the force projection understander has logged on

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
518 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32353 readers
597 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS