151
submitted 1 month ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396125

Stephen Starr in Hamtramck, Michigan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 11.00 EDT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There have been no limits on us support to israel so far. They have gotten all they asked for. How could trump possibly give them more? Even if he did, they won't need it, it won't change anything.

Can you show some example of where we have limited israel in anyway? Why wouldnt that continue under Kamala? She won't say she'd do different, in fact she said Israel has a right to defend itself on a national talk show.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not and have never in this post debated about who will fund what. They made a moral stance that "There is no better or worse in actively arming and participating in a genocide." My point was to show how flawed that stance is. Which people still seem to disagree with. It seems like to most people giving $10 to Israel or $10 Billion is the same thing and causes the same amount of harm. Nothing but rigid morals that end up hurting more people in the long run.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
151 points (79.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
295 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS