405
submitted 16 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No, they're pointing out the obvious. Newsweek isn't what it used to be, and the claims are all sourced from Ukraine, with no external on the record confirmations, yet.

Ukrainian media has a moral obligation to service the propaganda needs of the war. That's neither good, nor bad, that's just a part of being in an existential war for survival. I don't blame them for it, and I'm certainly not bashing them for, I'm just pointing out reality.

I can't speak for the person you're responding to, but I have no trouble understanding why North Korea would send thousands of support personnel to Ukraine as the logistical tail to support their weapons platforms. Western nations have been doing the same thing inside Ukraine.

Maybe the story is true, it's possible. But I'm going to need to see better sources provided then a Kyiv Post article citing unnamed Western officials or Newsweek using Ukrainian articles as their source information.

That's it. If anything, it's more unreasonable to not be skeptical of early reports coming from any war zone, whether you want to believe them, or not.

[-] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 10 points 11 hours ago

The core of what they say is truthful, just like most propaganda. Why bother pointing it out? Why automatically doubt Ukraine, calling them very biased "at best"?

Because it's designed to undermine Ukraine and support the Kremlin and Pyong Yang.

[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

True, and Russia is always the one lying, it's their own strategy, Ukraine numbers are backed by CiA and UK intelligence right after, they actually lose support if they start lying, not Russia they only have lies, so fuck .ml

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I can't speak to that users motivations. I can only say that initial reporting out of any warzone should be viewed skeptically. I've already provided my rationale as to why, but ultimately, it's a personal choice.

I'd rather file away first reports as unconfirmed rumors, or incomplete assessments, until I've seen additional reporting from other sources I trust.

Maybe that user really is what you said they are, or maybe they just suck at articulating the point that I was making. I don't know.

[-] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

At least what Ukraine is claiming is somewhat based in reality compared to what russia claims.

According to russian sources, russia has destroyed some vehicle and plane types in higher numbers than ukraine ever had, yet Ukraine still has some.

Weird how that works.

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don't understand how anything I said inferred credibility unto Russian sources, much less Russian MOD claims on Ukrainian losses.

Can you reread my original comment, and then explain to me how anything I said, is directly related to anything you just said?

[-] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Nothing you said inferred credibility unto Russian sources, I just wanted to add my take on the bigger picture.

Which is, that Ukrainian reporting is probably not 100% correct and there probably are inflations somewhere (like you said), it is still bound to reality, while Russian reporting lost its touch with reality on day one.

I guess its a knee jerk reaction to all the tankies defending russia lol

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

Can I just downvote them anyway for being from .ml? (kidding)

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago

My first account was on Lemmy.ml, because that was the main one recommended or showing up, during the first Reddit exodus.

I've encountered enough reasonable and well intentioned Lemmy.ml users to not assume the worst, even if I get where you're coming from.

The same cannot be said for hexabear.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago

Yeah no, there's plenty of .ml users who have no idea of the political leanings of the server, I agree. Which is why I made it very clear I was kidding. I'm still keeping the instance blocked though.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
405 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38824 readers
2300 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS