24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago

He means optional preferential. It's what Queensland council elections use already, and at the time of the elections earlier this year the BCC Lord Mayor made comments about how the Fitzgerald Inquiry had recommended optional preferential and that it was wrong to switch to compulsory. The LNP runs on a very successful "just vote 1" campaign in Council elections, which is one of the reasons they control a 19/27 seat supermajority in BCC (5 Labor, 2 Greens, 1 independent).

I tried finding out why the FI made that recommendation but couldn't find a good answer. I did find other articles that pointed out FI also recommended changes to number of seats & voting system should not be decided by Parliament...and that in 2016 both parties were guilty of breaking that rule—LNP increasing number of seats, Labor switching to compulsory preferential. That turned out to be a fascinating story of powerbroking and political gamesmanship.

[-] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

It's not clear to me that moving to optional is what he means:

“Preferences should not be a thing in Queensland elections, and it won’t be if government changes,” he said.

This quote suggests to me he wants to get rid of preferences all together.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah I understand the lack of clarity in that statement, and I have no doubt that if he could get away with it he'd get rid of preferential voting in its entirety. But if you look at the context where the LNP has been pointing to the Fitzgerald Inquiry, and the comments by the Brisbane Lord Mayor, and the fact that Australians on the whole are very proud of our preferential voting system, he's definitely only proposing switching to optional preferential. Which is dangerous enough, considering how effective the LNP's "just vote 1" campaigns have been at Council elections.

[-] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

Fair call. It would be nice if QLD had an upper house to hopefully block proposals like this.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah absolutely. Or if we had a unicameral proportionally representative lower house, like New Zealand's national parliament, that would also be an improvement over the current situation.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3533 readers
152 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS