473

Discord says piracy subpoena would violate users’ First Amendment rights (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Gemini24601@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Discord defends itself against efforts to stop piracy on its platform by saying no to more invasive data collection. Even though Discord isn’t exactly known for privacy, this is a great move for its users. What are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

If you want the history automatically, you can’t expect privacy.

That's not true, you can pull the history from other users who happen to be online.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 month ago

The feds can also pull such history when they join the server

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, and the users of the channel could decide whether to share that history with new users or not. My point is that if you don't have messages on the server, the service can't help here, and it's up to the users of the channel to set their own policies. If the data is stored on the server, the service could be legally obligated to provide that data.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024

473 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59436 readers

1780 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS