701
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cadekat@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago

This is a government office. A government should be able to build the technical knowledge required to keep a private signing key secure.

I do agree that individual-to-individual cryptography is more difficult, but how often do you need to check the authenticity of a document from a friend or acquaintance, digital or otherwise?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well, a bank. A financial transaction. Health records. Not just email to your friends.

Government has the technical knowledge - heck many people here have that - but implementing a standard is a different problem, it’s a political problem. A pit full of vipers, in a sense. We’re unlikely to see standardized crypto signing anytime soon. At least IMO.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Has the potential. It’s another case of having a technical solution, but the implementation of it is the real problem, and the real hurdle.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
701 points (99.9% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7309 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS