97
Best router for home use? (literature.cafe)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by gabe@literature.cafe to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I am planning to eventually build my own home server, and when I do I will hook it up via ethernet. But I do want to switch away from the generic FIOS router and use my own for more control over my data and security. Any recommendations?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CapillaryUpgrade@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

You already have some good suggestions, so i just want to mention openWRT which can be flashed on off-the-shelf router combo (just check their supported devices first, if you go this route)

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Love OpenWRT!

As a networking noob I spent more than a week configuring it to get it right, including needing to SSH into it because I flashed the wrong firmware (do not get NA and EU confused, the difference is enough to flat line your modem).

But in the end, I eliminated my bufferbloat with SQM; a feature the stock device lacked. I also set up a USB to act as expanded storage to install more software.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

My TP-Link ER8411 can't be flashed with OpenWRT even though their software is based on a very old version of it. :(

I have 10Gbps internet and can't find any 10Gbps routers that support custom firmware. Building a pfSense system that supports 10Gbps would be much more expensive and use more power than a router that has a purpose-built SoC.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Have you thought about getting something like this?

https://youtu.be/a3EMMYTdOYo

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/a3EMMYTdOYo

https://piped.video/a3EMMYTdOYo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

I don't have space for full-depth rackmount hardware - I just have a small shallow networking rack.

From the video, it sounds like this device can't actually achieve 10Gbps in real life. At 46:44 in the video, he says that he got 6.5Gbps with the firewall enabled and one firewall rule, and at 47:15 he said that NAT download speed (i.e. what you'd experience with an actual internet connection) was only 4.2Gbps.

I get full speed through my ER8411, and it was cheaper than this device too ($350). I'm annoyed by a lack of IPv6 features, but it does achieve full 10Gbps speeds at least.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, that's kinda terrible, too bad

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It also works on x86 and has better bufferbloat mitigation than the BSD based router systems (*sense), which means lower latency/pings under heavy WAN (internet) load.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
97 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

39677 readers
206 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS