89
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by FuckyWucky@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Fun fact: USSR provided Cuba provided with discounted oil in exchange for Cuban sugar at above market prices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Des@hexbear.net 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

come on Russia. im sure you need some tasty sugar, rum, cigars, etc. and you got all this oil that's complicated to sell on the U.S. dominated market

(but honestly wish China would just donate a bunch of solar panels or do a Belt & Road and build them some power plants in exchange for some port access or something)

[-] Speaker@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

I'm sure the Hitlerian state of Amerikkka would be extremely chill about China having access to ports visible from Key West.

[-] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

the american state is a rabid animal with nothing in its mind but genocidal intent

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

China has announced the construction of 92 solar farms in Cuba as part of a joint effort to address the island’s energy crisis. The projects, carried out in collaboration between Cuban and Chinese companies, aim to add more than 2,000 megawatts to the island’s National Electric System.

It's underway but not really happening very quickly

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For reference, cuba's energy consumption is about 120 ~~MWh~~ GWh per year

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

MWh? That can't be right, that's too low (although I appreciate the numbers for reference)

The US DOE says about 16 TWh which sounds more reasonable for a population of ~11 million.

2GW times 24 hours time 365 days times a capacity factor of 20 percent is an annual production of 3.5 TWh so the planned solar farms would cover about 20 percent of annual usage

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No idea why the numbers are so different. The numbers I found were 120 GWh (not MWh, it was a typo). But that is still significantly less than the us doe estimate.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13556 readers
934 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS