529
submitted 3 weeks ago by Imhotep@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Woohoo!

So not only does putin get a big fat L, but the EU continues to grow! I believe from the EU and NATO partnerships, we will someday see 1 global, unifying government that will formalize conflict resolution, leading to a lasting and sustained peace on Earth. And what does global peace mean? It means a massive increase in standard of living for all, as well as expansion into SPACE! When we can unify as one people, only then can we truly embark on the journey Star Trek promised us.

I just wonder what our flag will look like.

But staying in the present, way to go Moldova. As a terrified American, it does me good to see favorable election results.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Two things:

  • That was kinda the dream after WWII, no?

  • Exploring space should be a uniting purpose of humanity, but colonizing space, as humans live now, is just wildly, hilariously impractical. It would be orders of magnitude cheaper and easier to live at the bottom of the ocean, or under the antarctic ice sheet. And this is speaking as someone really into exotic rocketry and transcendental sci-fi.

I'd recommend reading through Project Rho, if you're interested: https://projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/

As well as "farther future" but grounded Sci-Fi like Orion's Arm, where humanity doesn't really resemble its current form. And play KSP! The more you read and see, the more you realize "wow, sending humans through space is hard, and living there kinda doesn't make sense right now."

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, I still think that having an operational moon-based spaceport is something we could see in our lifetime.

And as with all things concerning global affairs, it takes time and consistent pressure to overcome the lizard-brain us-vs-them mindsets that is inherent to our human political sphere. We've already grown to the point that we could take care of everyone on the planet, shuffling off the shackles of a scarcity-based economy which so severely hindered global human advancement in the past. I can only imagine what the combined efforts of the American, European, and Chinese economies/governments could accomplish if they put aside their differences, and embraced a true lasting partnership.

Also the website you gave is so incredibly interesting, I need to look at it more before I can appropriately sing its praises

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I still think that having an operational moon-based spaceport

Depends what it's used for, but yeah. But I think the human habitation would be extremely minimal, and it would be more of a utilitarian "midpoint" for deep-space missions and a research site rather than a place of extensive human habitation.

Also read: https://www.orionsarm.com/xcms.php?r=oaeg-front

It's a fictional universe in a wiki format (with some short stories), but based on hard science, and (IMO) a much more realistic idealized depiction of what future humanity could look like.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Being hard is the point. (That's what she said).

In making that attempt, we have to solve a lot of problems. How do we make a self-sustaining ecosystems where humans can live indefinitely? Can humans live that long in reduced gravity without issues? Can children be raised to healthy adulthood in reduced gravity? Is human pregnancy even possible there (probably is, but we don't know that for sure)? Are there technologies or genetic engineering that we could use to solve the issues we encounter?

How do we mine asteroids? How do we manufacture things in zero gravity? How do we build the Internet to handle latency measured in minutes or hours or days?

These are all hard problems, but if they were easy, then they wouldn't be interesting.

And I'd say the same for ocean colonies. That's hard, too. Not quite as hard, but hard.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Colonization doesn't make sense in light of what's likely to come first. Artifical intelligence, mind uploading, extensive genetic engineering, programmable nanotech for fabrication, take your pick... All these are infinitely more reachable and cheaper than dedicating tons of resources to sustaining a squishy, fragile human bodies in space while the vast majority are still stuck on Earth due to economic constraints.

It's just not economical until humans are so different that it doesn't really resemble are Star Trek-ish visions of humans on space boats (eg they're flying around in computers, AI are sent ahead to construct habitation, bodies are genetically engineered for survival in space, that sort of thing).

Again, I am not talking about research or the glory of stepping foot somewhere, but I just don't see the point of trying to emulate a traditional human living in an environment where it's so impractical.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully our election across the pond will go against the fascists as well. 🤞

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Most of my problems aren't caused by conflict between my nation and other nations. One world government is just another government, it can be a capitalist hellscape just like mine is today.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I keep seeing this repeated, but it's simply not true. Capitalism isn't the problem, Oligarchy is. This article I linked mathematically proves that it doesn't matter what form of governance your society uses, it inevitably falls into an oligarchy without strong recurring investments into social welfare.

So, keep voting for the people that want to expand social security, expand job protections, expand medicare/healthcare, increase the minimum wage, while decreasing cost of living, education, and housing (progressive democrats, basically).

If we can get Kamala in office, with a supermajority in the house/senate, we could finally pass some much needed shit, and stave off the inevitable turn to fascism that an oligarchal society seems to induce. It would have been better if we just elected Bernie Sanders, but can't stall progress for perfection!

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's literally saying that capitalist economies concentrate wealth and lead to oligarchy. It's not talking about "any kind of government" and in fact it's always talking about economies: specifically free market economies only. You can combat those forces, but they're the forces of capitalism, and capitalism is the problem.

You show a lack of knowledge and imagination. This is capitalist realism incarnate. Yes, every kind of capitalist economy moves towards oligarchy, good point?

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

huh. you're both wrong AND an asshole. interesting combo you've got goin' on there.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Here's a link showing how oligarchy forms under free market systems https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/

Have you read it?

[-] Zuba@lemmy.eco.br -3 points 3 weeks ago

The UN was created for conflict resolution after WWII. Look at how its working out for Palestine.

EU (and NATO for that matter) are just beneficiaries of colonialism and will employ force to keep it that way.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
529 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39013 readers
868 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS