56
Anthropic Wants Its AI Agent to Control Your Computer
(www.wired.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
56 points (96.7% liked)
Technology
59674 readers
1928 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Y'all remember when we found out all the AI in the walkout Amazon grocery stores was just a bunch of dudes in an Indian call center watching cameras? That would be hilarious if this was the same, some random dude in India sshs into this dude computer then gets annoyed about it if date packages on the system and it spirals from there.
I see that Amazon Go nonsense parroted a lot here on Lemmy. It's not true.
Humans are involved in resolving issues (like self-driving cars that get stuck), and training, but it's not just a bunch of people watching cameras and updating a spreadsheet of your groceries.
The Verge has an article on the subject.
But if they’re having to manually edit 700 of 1000 orders, then it’s like saying “self driving but we have someone take over every 5 minutes”. Which is extremely misleading when they say “it’s AI!!!!”
It's not clear that "review" here means that the original solution by the system was different from the human solution. Perhaps 350 out of 700 were identical, I can't say, but it's certainly not true that the entire system was just humans watching video feeds, and that's the claim I'm disputing.