42

A blast and gunfire were heard at the premises of the headquarters of Turkish Aerospace Industries. The Turkish interior minister called it a "terrorist attack," adding that it caused deaths and injuries.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is it terrorism to attack military facilities and military contractors...?

This company manufactures drones and aerial platforms that are used to to kill Kurds, or at minimum, members of Kurdish militias.

If the Kurds had the capability to launch an aerial bombardment of their production facilities, we would recognize that as a legitimate military strike, of a legitimate target, but they don't have those advanced capabilities.

If they followed executives home and murdered their families, okay, terrorism... But you can't call this terrorism, while cheering on Ukrainian drones strikes on Russian industries, inside of Russia.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Its a very weird line.

Back in ww2 when the allies ran the bombing campaign of German cities the "justification" was that civilians were being used to manufacture arms for the armed forces therefore a part of the military logistics network, and in fairness yes they were - like the British were at the start.

On the other hand it is a deliberate attack on civilians who are not in uniform, not part of the armed forces and not combatants. You could quite easily follow this path to everyone who pays tax or trades with that country as supporting the war effort.

Going at it from a different direction, terrorism is defined as non state actor, using violence against civilians, for a political objective. Therefore terrorism.

Is it justified - probably not but neither is much of warfare. Proportional but didn't minimize civilian casualties.

Is it terrorism - leaning towards yes.

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The WWII allied strategic bombing campaigns are nothing close to what occurred here. The comparison is at best, ilconceived, but at worst, intentionally disingenuous.

This company manufactures weapons to sell to their government for a profit, which are then used to kill a particular ethnic group. That means it's a part of their military industry, and as such is a legitimate target.

Terrorism does not require a non-state actor, I don't where you got that definition from. Terrorism is any attack that is strictly against civilian non-combatants, for the express purpose of achieving a ideological or political objective. This was an attack on a military contractor who is actively profiting and engaged in this specific conflict.

A very lopsided conflict that Turkey has been engaged in for decades, so for Turkey to cry foul about this, and decry it as terrorism, is particularly loathsome.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
42 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38878 readers
2622 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS