74
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Here's the thing though, these skills aren't present in the current workforce. Here's a perfect example for you https://www.popsci.com/technology/stinger-missiles-raytheon-ukraine/

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

For the Stinger, and I'm sure a huge number of other cold-war era military equipment it's not, and of course that is a systemic problem for the US Military. But the missiles they are launching from destroyers are in active production, so the lack of knowledge problem doesn't exist there.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

The question is about scaling production up significantly which would require an existing pool of qualified people. Given the miserly amounts the US is capable of producing currently, it's not a given that this can be scaled up easily.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I agree. But it's also not a given that the US despite it's huge amount of resources, people, historical investment, and fiat currency can only produce 12 missiles a year and that is the hard limit without impossible investment.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

What I'm saying is that you can't just flip a switch and scale that up overnight. It's going to be a process, and these things always take a lot longer than people anticipate. Consider how the US is still incapable of ramping up shell production for Ukraine after nearly three years of war. Producing artillery shells is much simpler than missiles, and yet despite billions having been poured in, there's little to show for the effort.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2307 readers
85 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS