-16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
-16 points (31.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7181 readers
522 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The NYT is only listing the third party people so after Trump wins they can go "If only 100% of third party voters had voted for Kamala (and maybe moved to a different state) Kamala would have won! 😭" instead of going "if 1% of Republicans in 3 states had voted for Kamala she would have won! 😭" which would make more sense since she's campaigning with the last Republican president and running on a basically GOP platform of endless war, tax cuts, a big beautiful wall...