1863

Not allowed to work from home (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

234 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Rolando@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The response was that they couldn’t stay operating if they paid everyone for being on call instead of us “supporting the company”.

That's the heart of the matter. They wanted you to support the company, without the company supporting you.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024

1863 points (98.6% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20 readers

1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS