483
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Perhaps this just means people value her feet more than music? I'm not into feet, but I really didn't like her music, so maybe this is reasonable.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

Not really. It just means onlyfans pays more than Spotify... which seems obvious to me??? A direct subscription to an artist vs only a few cents per play... yeah, no brainer, the artist is going to make less money in the latter deal.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The article is just garbage, it says it's estimated she makes 4k a day with Spotify and 8k a month with OF

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

The article didn't claim she made more money on OnlyFans than on Spotify, Lily Allen did. They just then provided the estimated revenue from both services using the numbers claimed by her. It could be that they used the wrong estimation for one or both of the revenues, but what's more likely is that Lily Allen exaggerated her example.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
483 points (96.2% liked)

Not The Onion

12388 readers
382 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS