-56

Trump receives endorsements from Muslim, Arab leaders at Michigan rally. (www.thecentersquare.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Other sources:

Saturday's rally occurred less than 24 hours after Israel struck Iran with strategically targeted missiles the night before. The ongoing turmoil in the Middle East was among the reasons the Muslim and Arab leaders cited in their endorsement of the former president.

"We are supporting Donald Trump because he promised to end war in the Middle East and Ukraine," Alzuhairi said. "The bloodshed has to stop all over the world, and I think this man can make that happen."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Civilians die in every war and of course that’s terrible.

The best numbers currently available are 40k dead total from which 15k are combatants. That’s less than 3 civilians per combatant. Urban warfare is historically much worse.

I don’t think the available information proves the war in Gaza is a genocide. It should stop regardless.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There is no proof that you will accept that the genocide in Gaza is a genocide. Do not pollute my inbox again with your apologia.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

The only proof you showed is 14 dead children.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

14 PAGES of dead INFANTS. Or as you call anyone who Netanyahu murders for you, "terrorists."

https://www.commondreams.org/news/rashida-tlaib-gaza-children

Here's something for you to not read, like you didn't read my comment about 14 pages of dead Palestinian infants the first time, and like you didn't read how I told you to not pollute my inbox with your disgusting genocide apologia again.

Then again, your opinions weren't reached by reading, it's why you're a genocide denier.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Look up the definition of genocide. Dead civilians are not sufficient to fit the definition.

If you don’t want replies, don’t comment on a public forum.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976

https://jewishcurrents.org/a-textbook-case-of-genocide

https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/

Let's not pretend that there is anything other than the complete slaughter of all Palestinians that will satisfy you. Or your definition of genocide.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I wrote that the war should end and you suggest I will only be satisfied if all Palestinians are killed. You are a deeply unserious person.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I wrote that the war should end and you suggest I will only be satisfied if all Palestinians are killed.

That is one way for the genocide to end.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Apparently the one you want.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I want the genocide to end now. You keep pretending it's not a genocide.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024

-56 points (14.1% liked)

politics

19237 readers

1256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News