-15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I guess Harris/ Waltz couldn't find the MI exit.

Bill Clinton did find the time to get to MI though. And he.. oh no he..

Bill Clinton Justifies The Mass Killings Of Palestinians In Racist Michigan Speech

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh fuck. Dammit, Bill. Just make it clear that the party has completely abandoned them.

Alienate voters you need. Blame them for any loss you earn in so doing. Fucking hell, why are we doing this again?

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Muslim populations in the swing states that Biden won in 2020 is larger than the margin of votes he received. They've learned absolutely nothing from 2016.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

They learned that they can browbeat the left into silence and get everything they want if they just lose.

He's trying to make the pro-Netanyahu case to them

Israeli forces have to kill tens of thousands of Palestinians because they are allegedly human shields for Hamas.

I.e. Hamas is evil and it's their fault that Israeli bullets ended up inside of innocent Gazians. There is an element of truth to this, but as the article points out,

It should be noted that the Israeli military has recently been accused of using Palestinian civilians as human shields in their Gaza operations.

The only good thing about this is that it makes Harris look more moderate by comparison.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hold up... See, I recognize your username. So suddenly, you want the Democrats to win, despite your claims that anyone that supports them is pro-genocide?

Shouldn't you welcome this "mask off" moment from the Democrats?

Why the change of heart? Or is it just that you're allergic to acting in good faith?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

So suddenly, you want the Democrats to win, despite your claims that anyone that supports them is pro-genocide?

I want them to win. It's why I voted for Harris. I also want Democrats to stop supporting genocide. I don't claim that anyone who supports Democrats is pro-genocide. I claim that anyone who takes shrieking offense at people who don't like genocide supports genocide. And of course, anyone who is actively selling Netanyahu weapons is literally acting in support of genocide.

Shouldn’t you welcome this “mask off” moment from the Democrats?

I'm sure you do since Clinton has sided with Netahyahu. But no. I want Democrats to stop supporting genocide. Are you that incapable of conceiving of the concept that we shouldn't be supporting Netanyahu and his genocide?

Or is it just that you’re allergic to acting in good faith?

You started this comment by lying about my position. Not being mistaken, not exaggerating, just outright lying.

To be fair, it's Harris on the ballot, not (Bill) Clinton.

And, to her credit, Harris said this, https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/harris-appears-to-agree-with-protester-accusing-israel-of-genocide-what-he-s-talking-about-it-s-real/ar-AA1szCVt

This gives me optimism that post-election, Harris will allow her views to evolve in the right direction here.

Remember when Obama was against same-sex marriage? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-still-opposes-same-sex-marriage/ But he was open to having his mind changed, and eventually he did, https://www.cnn.com/2012/05/09/politics/obama-same-sex-marriage/index.html

This is what we need to aim for with Harris

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, it’s Harris on the ballot, not (Bill) Clinton.

I voted for Harris.

Jesus. None of you read. Not one. Just skip immediately to pasting your lecture.

Hey, I wasn't disputing that you voted for Harris - my "lecture" was to convince others in your situation that there's hope that Democrats will stop "supporting genocide" as you put it, after Harris wins.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

On second read, I see that I was wrong to jump to conclusions. Apologies.

Hey, no worries. Glad we got that clarified though - I was sweating buckets.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
-15 points (29.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS