418
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Peanut, who has amassed more than half a million Instagram followers, was euthanized by officials to be tested for rabies.

Peanut, the Instagram-famous squirrel that was seized from its owner's home Wednesday, has been euthanized by New York state officials. 

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation took Peanut, as well as a raccoon named Fred, on Wednesday after the agency learned the animals were “sharing a residence with humans, creating the potential for human exposure to rabies," it said in a joint statement with the Chemung County Department of Health.

Both Peanut and Fred were euthanized to test for rabies, the statement said. It was unclear when the animals were euthanized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The statement said one of the officials involved in the investigation into Peanut and Fred was bitten by the squirrel.

Sorry but they had no real choice on this one. Vaccines can and should be administered immediately to any human bitten by an animal in all cases, but vaccines are not foolproof and the animals must be tested. The only method to test for rabies is removal of brain tissue.

Just because a wild animal is docile to some humans or has its own social media account does not mean they are pets and they should never have been in this situation unless the property owner was a certified rescue and rehab.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

The dude had started getting his certification seeing as the squirrel didn't want to return to nature and had become domesticated when the raid happened. The owner wanted to be in line with the law, but that apparently just put a giant flag on him. Also, do they have to conduct a surprise raid instead of just approaching the guy and attempting to be civil with him? I saw no information that a civil approach was taken.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

The NBCNews article doesn't mention the word raid anywhere, it says inspection. If you know more about the story then your words are plausible but going by the article your account doesn't match. The owner waited 7 years to try for certification, supposedly.

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

but vaccines are not foolproof

Yes they are. Only pointing out so there is not unnecessary fear spread about rabies. It is 100% preventable before or after exposure.

Does the rabies vaccine work? The rabies vaccine works remarkably well. Studies indicate that if the vaccine is given immediately and appropriately to someone who was bitten by a rabid animal, it is 100 percent effective.

https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-details/rabies-vaccine

[-] buttfarts@lemy.lol 6 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think the government needed to get involved. If this guy was hoarding animals then okay. He had a squirrel and the gov't killed it? Thank you gov't I really feel safer now knowing you killed this guy's squirrel.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He had two wild animals, the first one for at least 7 years, and was making income from them without ever getting certification to house them. These rules exist to protect people and animals from harm.

The Guv'ment doesn't just break in and trash the place, kill the animals, for shits and giggles. I'm sure they would much rather be somewhere else far away from this shitshow. Blaming the inspector is victim blaming.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You can put the animals in isolation

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But you cannot test for rabies without killing the animal. Rabies infections spread up the nervous system to the brain in hours, not weeks.

The animal bit a human, at that point nothing could be done.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

You can vaccinate the bitten human right away without any test, which is how it's really done. Waiting for test results is not a good idea. If the vaccine didn't work (it does work if administered in time), then there would be no help for the person. Testing is unnecessary.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

You always get vaccinated for an animal bite immediately no matter what. There are additional doses and close observation for confirmed cases.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No vaccine is 100% effective. They need to test for rabies in case the vaccine doesn't work properly so they can take extra care to prevent issues. If it comes back negative, fine. If it comes back positive then you need to take extreme care or the person is going to die. I'd rather a squirrel, which someone should have as a pet anyway, die instead of a person. There's no way that house was ideal for a squirrel unless they lived in a forest.

Edit: reading the information someone else posted, it is 100% effective, but not just with one shot. Several doses need to be administered several days apart. If the test comes back negative, those don't need to be taken.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
418 points (96.9% liked)

News

23406 readers
1782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS