Respectfully, I don’t know where you are pulling that equivalence from? I don’t believe I said 1 in 5 would likely die from losing a pregnancy?
Ummm dude
Texas killing this child for losing a pregnancy is akin to them having you roll a 5 sided dice and shooting anyone who lands on a “4” between the eyes.
You totally did, and this is what triggered my response.
The Android OS is very hostile to background processes running.
The rules around what's okay and what's not is constantly changing, so apps that need to run things in the background are constantly having to update things so they can work properly and sometimes they don't, or they do it wrong, and then certain features don't work properly like push notifications or schedules events.
Then, even if the developer does everything perfectly you get OEMs like Samsung that ignore the rules and fuck with your app anyway, and the literal only way to stop it is to go into the OS setting and disable a lot of things, which puts the onus on the user, and not the developer to make the app work.
But Samsung is such a bitch that even then they don't honor your settings and sometimes revert them, or add new ones that fuck with it again in a constantly changing hard to find nested settings menu.
I actually do like my Samsung phone, but god damn fuck you Samsung for doing this.
If you want a phone that at least follows the ever changing rules properly, get a pixel.
The sentiment is there, but 1 in 5 ending in miscarriage is not 1 in 5 that would be deadly if a miscarriage happened.
Also, that number is known miscarriages (and is the high end i believe of the range). Even more happen before the mother even knows they are pregnant.
Part of the reason you don't tell people before the first trimester is over is because miscarriages before are common.
Because the leopard at her face.
Oops i spoiled the ballot. Too late to get another one, guess I'll vote in person.
What poll workers should really do, is not detect they've already voted and charge them with attempted voters fraud... let them begin voting the 2nd time and then stop them or get them after they completed things.
Now it's actual voter fraud and intent is proven.
What's the sun tzu art of war saying, never interupt an enemy making a mistake.
Subpoena his Facebook messages and I bet you'd find him messaging friends how he was going to vote twice and they should too.
That would have been enough.
Not sure how you'd win access to them in the first place, but they've been used before.
It’s for your safety.
That new surface is very risky, and if you don't use the right connector it might catch the whole mini on fire!
The claim is that their own hosted cloud computing for AI is also secure and that Apple has no idea/can't know what it's computing for you.
No clue if it's true, but that is the direction all cloud AI stuff should go.
it opens up a whole new surface for things. Soon there will be a dozen USB C ports on the bottom and you'll need to buy special apple right angle cables to access them that they charge $30 per 1m cable.
Texas killing this child for losing a pregnancy is very similar to having you roll a 5 sided dice and shooting anyone who lands on a "4" between the eyes.
~~Your equating the 1 in 5 miscarriages to having a 1 in 5 chance of death but 1 in 5 miscarriages do not have a chance of death very similar to being shot if you roll a 4 on a 5 sided dice which is a 1 in 5 chance of death.~~
Edit: Just cleaning this up as what I wrote got confusing...
Your saying that 1 in 5 pregencies have a miscarriage (20%) and equate a miscarriage that happens 1/5 times, to being shot 1/5 times which would be death. But an (edit untreated) miscarriage doesn't mean death. So it is not very similar to having a 1/5 chance of death by being shot.
Maybe you don't know what you wrote?