36
submitted 18 hours ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 19 points 18 hours ago

Unfortunately the export of water will only benefit the megacorporations that already has control like Nestle.

It's difficult to imagine Canadians who are already experiencing localized and frequent drought conditions to export what limited supply we have.

One method that might encourage Canadians to consider exporting water is an agreement that ALL profits will be shared to low and middle income class Canadians as we all know that capitalistic systems are highly unsustainable and are immensely toxic for anyone involved.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

Some water company bought land in Colorado, pumped as much water as they wanted, lowered the level of the aquifer significantly enough to cause local wells to run dry for years, and it was perfectly legal for the company to do that. We need protections to prevent similar stories in Canada. Not just people but many local or even distant ecosystems depend on our aquifers.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

We already have that problem. Look at Nestle being allowed to pump water when there was a drought and how cheap water is for them.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
469 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS