139
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
139 points (97.9% liked)
Linux
48376 readers
1479 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The MAC address is anonymized with sha256, and IP adresses aren't stored.
So this seems to me to be perfectly anonymous.
Why collect such data though? And you can call some Big Tech telemetry completely anonymous too if you trust their explanations.
You can see the code of what is send.
I'm not aware that Google claims they collect data anonymously, on everything where you are logged in.
So that's a false equivalence.
I meant other companies but ok.
MAC addresses are 48 bit, and half of that is just the manufacturer. So 24 bits really, and those bits aren't random, I think manufacturers just assign these based on some scheme, like a serial number. Point is you could easily reverse the SHA by brute force.
You can't calculate any useful statistic from a hash so literally the only use this would have is some sort of tracking.
Edit: I just looked up some data and I found someone using hashcat on an RTX 3090, which looks like it can do almost 10000 million SHA256 hashes per second of salted passwords (which are longer than 48 bit MACs, so MACs should be faster). 2²⁴ is 16.8 million, so it'll take about 1.7 ms per vendor. I found a database with (all?) 53011 vendor ids:
Yup, 89 seconds. You can calculate the SHA256 of every single MAC ever potentially issued in 89 seconds on a bog-standard 3090.
It's right at the top of the announcement, that it's mainly for more accurate stats on unique users.
It's not that I think this is a good idea, because I don't, but some people are blowing it out of proportions. Especially since this isn't at all decided. Which I seriously doubt it will.
You don't need this to count unique users. You could just assign a random number on install or whatever. Or even more simply, just run the thing once per month, should be accurate enough. Do they expect the software to just randomly spam duplicate reports? Don't write it that way.
Best case they don't care about collecting minimal data and don't understand that hashed MACs are easily reversible. So incompetent fools with no sensitivity to privacy.
Maybe this should be Manjaro's tagline: Not purposely malicious, just grossly negligent and ignorant.
Funny, I thought the exact same thing.