469
Donald Trump's election win could lead to porn being banned
(www.newsweek.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
469 points (98.0% liked)
politics
19089 readers
1429 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I am not a fan of porn. I find it problematic. But fucking get real, no one’s banning porn. Everyone has a porn-producing camera in their pocket. These fucking idiots, I hope they all have painful and protracted aneurysms.
GOP is the party of rules for thee not for me. The leadership are all disgustingly wealthy so they can easily fly their mistresses to another country for abortions, drug fueled sex parties, etc...
When will people realize that none of that shit matters anymore. They absolutely will ban it, and they will selectively enforce the ban.
That's how fascism works. There's no, "but the people will be upset". Yeah no shit that's the point.
Pot is illegal, and everyone is high, but a cop could make an example out of anyone any time in an illegal state.
Same scenario.
No, you dont get it. They want to do it precisely because everyone has a porn-producing camera in their pocket, and they can selectively enforce what gets prosecuted. Who wants to bet they go after the gay "porn" first? (And by porn, I mean "picture of two men kissing")
Exactly. This will be just like the "war on drugs" - something to weaponize against groups they don't like.
I don't think even the war on drugs is a strong enough comparison. I don't think we have anything in our nation's history that will compare to the transformation that will occur come January 20.
The nation will become unrecognizable. This paradigm of, "we need good candidates," and, "the Democrats need to pander more to the left" shit will cease to exist, because fair elections will cease to exist. Political parties will be declared terrorist organizations, and many people will likely be executed (or at the very least, imprisoned for a very long time, simply for identifying as a Democrat).
There is no analogy for this. Not in US history at least...
One corollary is that it'd probably make a little easier for law enforcement/government agencies to subpoena ISPs or snoop around in phones looking for things that aren't porn. Realistically probably won't happen but I bet this is a cop's wet dream similar to 'distinct smell of marijuana'. Plausible deniability is big brother's best friend
Again, at the risk of repeating myself: they will not need subpoenas dude. That's not how fascism works. The corporations will become an arm of the government, to be used at the whim of its sole leader, or they will be eliminated.
This has happened before.
People are still talking as if things will just continue as normal, and there will be rule of law that is in any way fair. Please wake up, people.
Indeed. This is the breakdown of individual rights people were referring to.
I’m sure it will start with some sort of “think of the children.”
Yup, hypothetically like the Patriot act. Blow smoke up everyone's ass saying they only use it within its scope (a rather virtuous scope such as 'preventing sexual exploitation'), the majority with their suspension of disbelief chanting that mantra 'if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear'. If you go so far as to point out how it could hypothetically be misused you're met with everything from 'take the tinfoil hat off' to 'which side are you on'. Or worse.
But then years later everyone finds out that it was misused so much that even those misusing it can't determine the extent to which it was misused. Just a bunch of case studies of criminal charges in which it was found to have been misused
Some red states have started requiring showing a government id to access the website. That was before the gop was in control of all branches of the feds. Bucket up you haven't seen America be great again yet, it's gonna be wild.
Am aware. Yes, shit bouta be wild up in this bitch. I am here for it (if they don’t kill me, anyway).
But, let’s be real: there’s nothing substantial standing in the way of accessing porn, even in a redneck backwater. Just gotta be more intelligent than a slime mold to defeat that shit.
So you're saying MAGA won't be able to access porn?
you also had to have a just a single brain cell advantage over slime mold to not vote that fascist shithead back into office.
Let me lay it out for you.. lol you know what I'm not going to type that out and give anyone "ideas" have a good day, happy gooning.