56
AMD's desktop CPU market share jumps by nearly 10% in a year, all at the expense of poor old Intel (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 6 days ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] terraborra@lemmy.nz 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

AMD has clawed back a hefty 10% market share in the desktop x86 CPU segment over the last year. And that has us wondering, could those crashing 13th and 14th Gen CPUs be hurting Intel's sales?

I mean that’s a pretty obvious yes. Even if the 285k had been a decent product I still wouldn’t have considered it after seeing that Intel knew about oxidation issues and tried to hide it. Then you have the poor thermals and high power draw of previous 2 gens on top of the cpu problems. I’d already made up my mind to upgrade to AM5 before the 9800x3d was released and reviewed.

[-] Mettled@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago

Make a Core Ultra 9 and a Core Ultra 7 without any E-cores and people will buy. And not disabled e-cores but no physical e-cores on the die.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
56 points (98.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8551 readers
784 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com