129
submitted 2 months ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cabbage@piefed.social 19 points 2 months ago

When could it really?

I know it did, but I feel like we're just waking up from some 80-year trance where we idiotically thought the US was something we could depend on.

[-] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago

The Marshall Plan was a hell of drug.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

also the big stick policy. not everyone of us did that by choice.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
129 points (97.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5466 readers
548 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS