1323
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

The problem is that he was likely joking. It’s a shitty joke on our end but Walsh is deliberately using people’s panic to make fun of the media and the left in general.

The point of the joke was to trigger alarms and make people write dumb articles about it. Then he can point and laugh about how his joke triggered you and also turn accusations about Project 2025 into a hyperbole that the left uses. From then on the phrase will be easily ignored by moderates as an overreaction from the left. Because in this case it is an overreaction, he’s clearly trying to scare people.

Just keep in mind that this is a common tactic they employ to take the sting out of certain terms and to keep their base unaware of the BS. It’s why the left can’t rally around phrases like the right can.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 6 months ago

I don’t disagree with your analysis of what he’s doing, but I don’t think he’s joking in the sense that he doesn’t mean it. He’s “joking” in the “haha just kidding… unless? 👀” sense.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

They can rally around them, but they're too busy in-fighting.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 7 points 6 months ago

Shut the fuck up, you take that back right now bitch.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's misogyny and I'm telling on you!

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 7 points 6 months ago
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

It's a "joke" in the way conservatives always use that excuse for plausible deniability when they say something bigoted.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
1323 points (99.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

6751 readers
458 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post is on-topic isn't in the article or self-explanatory, you must use a second (high-quality) source to explain why your post fits the criteria.
  4. Articles should be high-quality sources. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it's marked in red, it probably isn't allowed; if it's yellow, exercise caution.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS