16
[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago

You definitely can do without a language spec. I heard in aerospace another approach is common: They use whatever compiler and then verify the binary. That means different tradeoffs of course.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

In SIL world, the C++ issues would not be considered bugs but maybe change requests.

The SIL philosophy (as far as I know it from ASIL) is "unsafe unless convinced otherwise". That seems like a good idea when the lifes of humans are on the line. Without a spec how would you argue that a system/product is safe?

(Aside: Software in itself cannot be safe or unsafe because without hardware it cannot do anything. Safety must be assessed holistically including hardware and humans.)

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

Fair enough. In practice, we resolve it recursively with a higher level specs and at some point it is just "someone wants that". In commercial software development (where SIL is used) that is a customer who pays for it or some executive.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago

Welcome to the real world. /s

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago

The specification does not make anything happen but it enables you to say "the implementation is wrong". Of course, you can say that without a spec as well but what does "wrong" mean then? It just means you personally disagree with its behavior. When "wrong" means "inconsistent with the spec" everybody involved can work with more clarity and fewer assumptions. Wrong assumptions can kill people flying rockets.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

Crates.io has tags like scripting. It suggests languages like rhai, dyon, or rune.

1
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

Temo didn't figure his vote for President Donald Trump would affect them personally. That was before the enforcement of Mr. Trump's "zero tolerance" policy toward illegal immigrants.

1
1
589
[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 days ago

Better append /s

921
814
1232
14
36
26
18
[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 5 months ago

Ich sehe da da gutgemeinte Ironie aber für Wahlwerbung ist das zu subtil.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 7 months ago

Falls die Grünen in Thüringen an der 5% Hürde scheitern, könnte die AfD ein Drittel der Sitze bekommen. Dann können sie ganz legal den Verfassungsschutz lahmlegen.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 7 months ago

Warum geht hier kein Ansatz von "Markt regelt"? Wenn die Infrastruktur teurer wird, muss sich das halt im Preis niederschlagen. Deswegen gibt es doch "Grundpreis" und "Verbrauchspreis" in der Gasrechnung.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 8 months ago

Die gute alte Frage nach Korrelation vs Kausalität

view more: next ›

copacetic

joined 1 year ago