459
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A California Superior Court judge arrested last week has now been charged with killing his wife in front of their adult son at their home. Court filings reveal the judge had over 47 weapons and 26,000 rounds of ammunition in his home.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Take a moment to admire the marketing of the gun manufacturers for a minute. Like, imagine someone having 47 toasters.

Gun Manufacturers and the NRA (same thing) are good at what they do.

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not really a fair comparison though. They all handle and fire different. This piece of shit is still a piece of shit, but collecting different guns is more akin to "I participate in 10,000 point fights with my choice of Orks or Blueberry Spacemarines" than toasters.

Noone needs that but that's a hobby.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

All toasters toast differently too.

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean yeah, if someone had 50 different toasters that apply different patterns we wouldn't bat an eye at it because that's a hobby.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

A hobby he killed his wife with because it's a hobby that appeals to shitheads.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

At least we agree that it's mostly the shitheads that are the problem, not so much the hobby. I'm pretty sure this shithead would have killed his wife if his hobby was hiking or cosplay too.

Ever hear the story of the nuclear boy scout? Now thats a hobby no one should be allowed to have.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

You can wax hypothetical about what abusers would have done, but they overwhelmingly use guns, since they're great for threatening people or executing them in an instant with a slim chance of survival or intervention.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

well yeah, they're literally designed to do that.

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Shitheads get into all hobbies. Some hobbies are more dangerous than others, and need more safety than others.

You know what's a dangerous hobby that ALSO appeals to masculinity-troubled people? Modding cars to go faster and drift harder. You can tool around in them legally and if you drive like a shithead you can drive through a crowd. Modding pickups is also a big shitwaffle magnet. Still a hobby.

I avoided the whole "are guns the problem" subject in my comment for a reason. My comment served to illustrate that collecting large numbers of "Object" is a hobby. Whether or not the hobby is good, or bad, or dangerous, or safe, was not my comment.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Again, using hypothetical other people to dodge what this person did: executed a family member with a legal firearm.

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, it was a correction of how people collecting guns is not like collecting the same toaster over and over, more like different toasters, specifically not addressing anyone's use of them.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

But you're specifically asking people to not treat gun collectors like toaster collectors.

If someone had a collection of 50 toasters, people would find that weird, but generally harmless.

But if that person then claimed to not be even slightly interested in toast, that would immediately set off warnings in people's head.

Why would they collect so many toasters if they didn't like toast? It's what toasters are for. Sure, they could maybe find some off label use for them, but that still makes it a weird choice of hobby.

I'd definitely think they were much more interested in toast than they let on and if they were one day caught eating toast with a full erection, I wouldn't be even slightly surprised.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago

Guns are a stupid and dangerous hobby, though. If Warhammer was responsible for thousands of deaths per year, I would not want to contribute to that, and I'd find something else to do.

[-] nutbiggums@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Easy to scare limp dick conservatives

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You think this guy has 47 guns because he’s scared? Really???

Edit: sure keep down voting me. No one buys 47 guns because they are “scared”. Clearly this guy loves guns and collects them for fun. He’s still a POS but describing what drives his behavior as “scared” just makes you look completely out of touch with reality, which doesn’t help improve the overall situation.

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

People who buy 1 gun are scared, people who buy 47 guns are scared people with an expensive hobby.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
459 points (95.3% liked)

News

23424 readers
2086 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS