172
Kotaku Staff Furious After Owner Announces Move to AI Content (futurism.com)
submitted 1 year ago by postscarce@kbin.social to c/gaming@kbin.social
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

G/O Media, an online media company that owns Gizmodo and Kotaku has announced that it will begin a "modest test" of AI content on its sites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zebrazilla@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not much was lost. Both Gizmodo and Kotaku content have already been indistinguishable from poorly generated AI content for ages now.

[-] postscarce@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree, it's been pretty bad for a few years now at least.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Shilling corpo propaganda made most "journalism" feel like it was AI generated corporate PR

[-] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ironically nothing seems to rile up some gamers more than when game journalists try to be more than a corporate PR relay. God forbid anyone talks about labor issues, social issues, or worse, actually publishes a critique of a popular triple-A game.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who is down voting this comment?

Labour issue in game development got ur panties all bunched up?!

I guess some really ain't got to work for money ehh?

[-] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Who is down voting this comment?

chatterbox and comedy. You can see them in the activity tab of the post.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh... Didn't even know about that feature. Ty for sharing!

@chatterbox and @comedy

[-] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

lol, @comedy downvoted me too in frustration. He forgot that he isn't on reddit anymore.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I am still hoping to hear what theor issue here is tbh..

Otherwise it feels like basic sinping for some legal persons

[-] chatterbox@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

So weird and obsessive to not only care about who might disagree with your comment, but to then seek to notify them demanding an explanation. Like I have to justify why I disagree or dont find any particular comment useful?

I diagreed because I am a gamer and I DO care about labor conditions in the industry. While I don't work in it, I have many friends that do and they identify as gamers and do care. I dont like making gamers a monolith, nor do I agree with the assertion that the reason they were disliked was due to them cocering labor issues. Thats why I downvoted the comment. I dont expect you or the others to agree with me, obviously, but the idea that you'd try to get people to justify it is fucking weird.

[-] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

So weird and obsessive to not only care about who might disagree with your comment, but to then seek to notify them demanding an explanation.

Well on this forum the votes are public. Deal with it. And if you can't then stop downvoting.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 2 points 1 year ago

People can down vote you without providing an explanation. Deal with it.

[-] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Well, new rule: now the votes are public.

[-] pleb_maximus@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

That's because Gamers are morons.

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
172 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

4 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago