646

submitted 2 days ago by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

191 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago

if one major power loses influence, another will benefit from the vacuum.

Multipolarism is not a vacuum. Hypocritical "Rules based world order" delusion backed by sycophantic colonies to tyranical CIA is a propaganda tool that deludes an empire into over reaching and collapse and "the vacuum".

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 17 points 22 hours ago

I think you may have misunderstood me. I'm not saying that imperialism is justified because of the possibility of a vacuum, I'm saying that the possibility of a vacuum is an acceptable risk for the sake of opposing imperialism.