965
Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
105 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago

referencing its data sources

Have you actually checked whether those sources exist yourself? It's been quite a while since I've used GPT, and I would be positively surprised if they've managed to prevent its generation of nonexistent citations.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Have you actually checked whether those sources exist yourself

When I'm curious enough, yes. While you can find plenty of "AI lied to me" examples online, they're much harder to fish for in the application itself.

99 times out of 100, the references are good. But those cases aren't fun to dunk on.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
965 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5246 readers
1708 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works