21
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by rcbrk@lemmy.ml to c/australia@aussie.zone

Australian Senate, last sitting of the year. No idea when the Social Media Ban debate is kicking off.

If anyone's keen, feel free to give a live run-down of anything interesting in this thread.

(sorry about all the edits, just trying to get a decent thumbnail: elevated photo of the Australian Senate)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

It's not even clear yet what form the ID checking will take. They've rushed this through way too fast and without proper consultation. But there does seem to be some sort of a plan that the ID checking would be done by a government service in some manner, rather than users needing to send ID directly to the platform.

[-] eatham@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago

Govt service is still bad, still links everyones social media accounts to their ID. The bill will do jackshit anyways, as under 16s will simply move to social media hosted outside of Australia.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

So of the top ofnyour head, a VPN will allow you to skirt this law?

I don't use social media beyond lemmy but be fucked if I want to give my I.D to anyone in relation to my online activities

[-] eatham@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Well, a VPN fakes your country, and the law only applies in Australia. Also, it is an unenforceable law anyways so I doubt it would do much

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 5 points 1 day ago

@eatham

Yes, but Social Media apps can derive location data through other means, including time zone and language settings, visible WiFi Access Points, not to mention GPS.

The Libs passed the legislation because they're corrupt.
Labor passed it because they're incompetent.

Either way, it's likely that the AustGov will be the gatekeepers of 'onboarding' and re-verification of existing users.

It's a disgrace.

@Aussiemandeus

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

"are you over 16" clicks yes well your honour they clearly provided false data so it's not our farkin' problem.

because honestly what fucking 16 year old has a proof of age card

[-] Baku@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago

because honestly what fucking 16 year old has a proof of age card

I know this is a rhetorical question, but the answer in Victoria is 0. Proof of age cards can't be applied for until 17y 11m, or used until 18. The other states set that at 15/16 for the most part (I think)

[-] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Last I saw the suggestions were drivers license or equivalent, face scan, or digital id. They’ve probably walked that back though or will do so because hell nah

[-] oahi@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Govt service, or privatised ID assurance face-scanning service wrought with error?

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Like I said, it's not clear yet what form it will take.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3623 readers
117 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS