I use it too in a VM, but this doesn't support being installed on routers, right?
We left out fully distributed FOSS that doesn't have any fixed location - maybe we'll update it some time with a box for that.
maybe you could show the jurisdiction of the devs for them, when known. for legal reasons that can affect development decisions
well, they do. unlike cryptobros, for some its not a form of ~~invesrment~~ gambling. but I hope most of them don't write crypto with a capital C.
It's not like they couldn't implement it though
what does fit well with the youtube interface though?
oh, that's right, sorry. it must have changed in recent years.
so I haven't either found a definitive answer to whether it is a default mount option, but the closest I found is almost it: man mount
says to look in man ext4
, and there itsays the defaults are determined by the filesystem superblock.
the superblock's settings can be viewed with tune2fs -l /dev/your_blockdev
, and according to the "default mount options" line I indeed have acl enabled by default on all my ext4 filesystems.
so in the end, the default is determined by the tool that makes the filesystem. mkfs.ext4
reads them from /etc/mke2fs.conf
if not overridden with an argument. on my system tue acl option is right there in this file.
and that also means that this depends not on your current system, but on the system where the filesystem was created.
that sounds to ge good advice, but I'm pretty sure they would yave done that themselves, if they had a backup.
and, if you read the whole post, you'll know that they are physically unable to keep a backup.
So does it wait until it has found all the matches to run the command as a giant batch instead of running it as it finds matches?
almost. it runs the command in batches, if you have few enough files it may only run it once. this shouldn't make it slower, but actually faster.
and yes, linux does not use ACLs by default. ~~on ext4 usage of ACLs is not even enabled by default, but only if you set it up with the right mount option~~
you can't remove the Google search bar from the Pixel launcher is still crazy to me.
yeah that's crazy, but it's relatively easy to fix compared to deep rooted bloat and whatnot in the system. the pixels even have good support for some alt ROMs, that can't be told about most samsungs, so you are basically forced to use their software
xiaomi doesn't allow third party launchers anymore?? what a shitty change. since when is that?
also, I would rather have "subpar" hardware and a decent OS than trendy hardware and all the bloat and datamining of the world. but that honestly excludes most phones.
thanks Microsoft for hiding extensions by default!
for localmonero the reason is not totally public, but what they communicated suggests that it was governments