[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 6 points 20 hours ago

for localmonero the reason is not totally public, but what they communicated suggests that it was governments

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

I use it too in a VM, but this doesn't support being installed on routers, right?

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago

We left out fully distributed FOSS that doesn't have any fixed location - maybe we'll update it some time with a box for that.

maybe you could show the jurisdiction of the devs for them, when known. for legal reasons that can affect development decisions

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

well, they do. unlike cryptobros, for some its not a form of ~~invesrment~~ gambling. but I hope most of them don't write crypto with a capital C.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

It's not like they couldn't implement it though

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago

what does fit well with the youtube interface though?

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago

oh, that's right, sorry. it must have changed in recent years.

so I haven't either found a definitive answer to whether it is a default mount option, but the closest I found is almost it: man mount says to look in man ext4, and there itsays the defaults are determined by the filesystem superblock.

the superblock's settings can be viewed with tune2fs -l /dev/your_blockdev, and according to the "default mount options" line I indeed have acl enabled by default on all my ext4 filesystems.

so in the end, the default is determined by the tool that makes the filesystem. mkfs.ext4 reads them from /etc/mke2fs.conf if not overridden with an argument. on my system tue acl option is right there in this file.

and that also means that this depends not on your current system, but on the system where the filesystem was created.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 8 points 6 days ago

that sounds to ge good advice, but I'm pretty sure they would yave done that themselves, if they had a backup.

and, if you read the whole post, you'll know that they are physically unable to keep a backup.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

So does it wait until it has found all the matches to run the command as a giant batch instead of running it as it finds matches?

almost. it runs the command in batches, if you have few enough files it may only run it once. this shouldn't make it slower, but actually faster.

and yes, linux does not use ACLs by default. ~~on ext4 usage of ACLs is not even enabled by default, but only if you set it up with the right mount option~~

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 6 days ago

you can't remove the Google search bar from the Pixel launcher is still crazy to me.

yeah that's crazy, but it's relatively easy to fix compared to deep rooted bloat and whatnot in the system. the pixels even have good support for some alt ROMs, that can't be told about most samsungs, so you are basically forced to use their software

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago

xiaomi doesn't allow third party launchers anymore?? what a shitty change. since when is that?

also, I would rather have "subpar" hardware and a decent OS than trendy hardware and all the bloat and datamining of the world. but that honestly excludes most phones.

121

Recently there was a post where the OP pitched an idea for a service related to this community. I don't want to go into details but the post's text has shown that maybe there's some misunderstanding around the technology, and a considerable amount of us also thought that it's not a good idea.
The post was removed (noticed because I couldn't reply to someone) probably because the OP felt shame for their "failed" idea, but I think we shouldn't delete posts for reasons like this.

The post created an interesting discussion around the idea with useful info. It's useful to have things like these for future reference, for similar discussions in the future.
This is an anonymous forum, so there's no shame in recommending things, when you do that politely like it was done in that case.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 168 points 8 months ago

thanks Microsoft for hiding extensions by default!

21

I have just installed the tmuxinator 3.0.5 ruby gem with gem 3.2.5 and the --user-install parameter, and to my surprise the gem was installed to ~/.gem/ruby/2.7.0/bin/.

Is this a misconfiguration? Will it bite me in the future? I had a quick look at the environment and haven't found a variable that could have done this. Or did I just misunderstand something? I assume that the version of gem goes in tandem with the version of ruby, at least regarding the major version number, but I might be wrong, as I'm not familiar with it.

I have checked the version of gem by running gem --version. This is on a Debian Bullseye based distribution.

60

The video is a short documentary on Trusted Computing and what it means to us, the users.

If you like it and you are worried, please show it to others.
If you are not the kind to post on forums, adding it to your Bio on Lemmy and other sites, in your messaging app, or in your email/forum signature may also be a way to raise awareness.

view more: next ›

ReversalHatchery

joined 2 years ago