[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 54 points 5 months ago

Sure, why not... I'll have 15 years of experience using ChatGPT, and only ask for a 2040s salary plus the time travel commute. 🙄

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 40 points 6 months ago

"Normal people", as in 99% of people, will not bother editing the URL... most of them don't even know what a URL is. They'll just keep using whatever search window they get in their "internet" (browser).

However, Google would rather scrapers and people with ad blockers not make them waste money on AI when they can't recoup them.

48
submitted 7 months ago by jarfil@beehaw.org to c/space@beehaw.org
[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 49 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

could be manufactured for 89 cents to $4.73 for a month’s supply

That compares to the monthly US list price of $968.52 for Ozempic, a weekly injection.

I got semaglutide (Rybelsus, the pill form) prescribed for type 2 diabetes. The list price in Spain for a 30 pill format (a month's worth) is around 130€ ($140) without discounts. Thanks to the prescription, I get it for free ($0.00)... which turns out to be closer to its actual value. Interesting 🤔

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 41 points 9 months ago

Only small services with fewer than 50 employees and annual turnover of under €10 million (around $10.8 million) are exempt.

Soon: large platforms firing everyone but 49 employees, and outsourcing all their operations to hundreds of companies with fewer than 49 employees each... all owned by the same shareholders.

11
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by jarfil@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

Brace for impact.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Researchers were able to isolate blood flow to the brain

could also help researchers design improved machines for human cardiopulmonary bypass that better replicate natural blood flow to the brain.

They didn't separate the brain from the body, only made a brain blood bypass.

Guess that wouldn't've made for a sensational enough title.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 53 points 11 months ago

Cautionary tale about why FOSS is important. Also about why Kbin lacking an official API is a problem.

27
submitted 1 year ago by jarfil@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

Israeli troops and tanks launched a brief ground raid into northern Gaza overnight into Thursday, the military said, striking several militant targets in order to “prepare the battlefield” ahead of a widely expected ground invasion

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 72 points 1 year ago

serve the public good — places like Wikipedia and Reddit forums

Sorry, lost me at Reddit.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I helped with the remodeling of a house once. Part of it involved moving the gas stove, and some electric sockets.

When the gas guy came, he looked at the installation, nodded, "old style, huh". Took out a saw, and went on for the gas pipe. I was like "WTF man! Don't we turn the gas OFF first!? 😯". Turns out, there was no way to "turn the gas off"... for a single apartment; it was either the whole apartment building, wait for it to purge, leaving everyone without gas in the meantime... or saw the metal tube as gas was leaking out of it. I just kept waiting for a spark to ignite the whole kitchen... but seems like the guy knew what he was doing, and the house didn't explode that day.

Meanwhile, we were discussing whom to call for the sockets. Gas guy overheard us, and went "just rip the cable off the plaster". We went like "WTF do you mean rip the cable off the plaster!? 😯". All helpful, he showed us: gave the cable from the socket a tug, and indeed some paint and plaster fell off, exposing the wires.

Turns out, he used to be on the building crew of those apartments, the whole house was wired by placing wires on the wall, then holding them in place with some plaster and painting over it... and no ground wires in sight 🤦

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 57 points 1 year ago

I can track engagement, and I can update them if need be

That's inherently bad as in:

  • Third party (you) tracking the user
  • Hiding the true target from the user
  • Destroying any attempt at content archival

They're not inherently bad "for you", just for everyone else.

269
submitted 1 year ago by jarfil@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

The difference between the two security features is that Safe Browsing will compare a visited site to a locally stored list of domains, compared to Enhanced Safe Browser, which will check if a site is malicious in real-time against Google's cloud services.

While it may seem like Enhanced Safe Browsing is the better way to go, there is a slight trade-off in privacy, as Chrome and Gmail will share URLs with Google to check if they are malicious and temporarily associate this information with your signed-in Google account.

89
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jarfil@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

This time, straight from a patent granted to a blockchain company, with no accompanying paper or proof.

Edit: after reviewing the patent, and as pointed out by @floofloof@lemmy.ca, this is an incredible amount of BS. The patent's initial date is Feb 2020, issue date Dec 2021. It has no proof, because it claims to speculatively apply a possible theory by someone else, onto how to make a flexible Type II semiconductor out of a Type I semiconductor, in case this ever happens to be possible with that theory. Basically a patent troll waiting to see if someone happens to make possible the elements they've used in the patent, then jump in and claim an application.

Honestly, didn't know speculative patents like this were possible.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The charges usually end up falling onto the last one who can't stick them onto someone else.

Like, a carrier can blame the ISP, who can blame the VPN, who can check its logs and blame an address owner, who... better keep their own logs capable of identifying someone else if they're letting random people do random stuff using that address. And a good lawyer, and will and money to fight it.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 114 points 1 year ago

THIS IS NOT (just) ABOUT GOOGLE

Currently, attestation and "trusted computing" are already a thing, the main "sources of trust" are:

  • Microsoft
  • Apple
  • Smartphone manufacturers
  • Google
  • Third party attestators

This is already going on, you need a Microsoft signed stub to boot anything other than Windows on a PC, you need Apple's blessing to boot anything on a Mac, your smartphone manufacturer decides whether you can unlock it and lose attestation, all of Microsoft, Apple and Google run app attestation through their app stores, several governments and companies run attestation software on their company hardware, and so on.

This is the next logical step, to add "web app" attestation, since the previous ones had barely any pushback, and even fanboys of walled gardens cheering them up.

PS: Somewhat ironically, Google's Play Store attestation is one of the weaker ones, just look at Apple's and the list of stuff they collect from the user's device to "attest" it for any app.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Long term? Minimal. All the niches it fills, have alternatives that would just grow to fill them in.

Short term? Catastrophic. Losing GMail and "login with Google" would leave a lot of people with no email, no way to login to other services, and no way to recover their passwords (through email). The loss of Photo backups would also upset many, Drive and Docs would leave a lot of people and businesses without their daily tools. Search would likely be the less affected, with plenty of alternatives already to pick from.

view more: next ›

jarfil

joined 1 year ago