It appears that Threads is working on a Communities feature called "Loop", which might be similar to subreddits or X Communities. (mastodon.xyz)

submitted 1 month ago by rglullis@communick.news to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

Embrace

Extend <==== you are here

Extinguish

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 22 points 1 month ago

I agree that's there plan, but aren't groups already a part of the activity pub spec?

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 month ago

me eating my consumerist fried chips over at mbin, where we can microblog and join subs already

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Depressing, but luckily I believe there are enough of us here who will stay.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

We have Lemmy communities already…

[-] eruraindil@fedia.io 28 points 1 month ago

Pixelfed's dansup is working on a federated short video platform called loops. It will be unfortunate if they end up with a naming overlap, especially if meta decides to be all aggressive with trademarks, even though this other project was announced months ago. I don't think dansup has a crack team of lawyers ready at his fingertips.

[-] andrew_s@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago

In that thread, Gargron (the Mastodon dev) saying that they have groups on the back burner is a bit of an understatement (the code to support Lemmy-style communities has been sat languishing for ages).

[-] Blaze@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago

Maybe this will make them release it?

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 month ago

Oh, it's Google+ circles.

[-] Kierunkowy74@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago

That is, Diaspora aspects.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago

So, they're already on the Extend phase. That was fast.

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 8 points 1 month ago

Are they choosing the names on purpose to mess with the fediverse vocabulary? Thread, when they are part of the twittoverse but not the threadiverse and now Loop like the TikTok-like federated social media from PixelFed...

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I would say they probably are, but it's way more likely than not that this is intentional. Why call communities loops? What about a community makes it a "loop"? It doesn't make sense, unless they're deliberately trying to cause confusion with fediverse terminologies.

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago

We could mess back. We cannot influence much their userbase but we could make sure to stick to our vocabulary and rename Meta's thing. For example, Thread should be rename MMT (Meta's Microblogging Tool) and Loops, their "communities" Bubbles.