3
submitted 6 months ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
1134
submitted 8 months ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

French immigrants are eating our pets!

30

tl;dr - If a project has been forked or is a fork, you can bruteforce short commit id to see commits from other projects. It doesn't matter if those projects were deleted or made private.

32
submitted 1 year ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I want a centralized way to manage keys and secrets. And some service users with little privileges over a subset of the secrets. Ideally, a service user only should be able to read its own subset of secrets. So, let's say, if a container gets pwned it will only read its secrets and no more. It should be FOSS and self-hostable.

And a beautiful nice-to-have feature would be access log, to know who read what and when.

My only experience with something similar is Hashicorp Vault, but I don't want to be near any Hashicorp stuff ever again.

Do you know a FOSS alternative to Vault?

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 71 points 1 year ago

“Have taken up farming.”

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 72 points 1 year ago

You are not gonna block the most popular man in the Fediverse, are you?

424
[-] vsis@feddit.cl 94 points 1 year ago

Hey, ChatGPT, my uncle says new Macbooks are just glorified Raspberry Pis.

How many MB/s are in a Raspberry Pi?

35
submitted 1 year ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/linux@lemmy.ml

My laptop is working just fine. It's from 2018 and it has an NVME drive.

It has an EFI boot partition and other partition with LUKS and LVM on top of that.

Since this week I see these logs from time to time:

Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6:   device [8086:34b6] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6:    [ 0] RxErr                  (First)
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: pcieport 0000:00:1d.6: AER:   Error of this Agent is reported first
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: nvme 0000:02:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: nvme 0000:02:00.0:   device [8086:0975] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
Mar 07 17:31:14 almendra kernel: nvme 0000:02:00.0:    [ 0] RxErr                  (First)

The devices are:

$ lspci -vv | grep 1d.6
00:1d.6 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 34b6 (rev 30) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

$ lspci -vv | grep 02:00.0
02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Intel Corporation Optane NVME SSD H10 with Solid State Storage [Teton Glacier] (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])

The laptop works like always, but I have the impression that the NVME drive is telling me something bad.

It happens from time to time:

$ journalctl --since yesterday | grep -c "nvme 0000:02:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical"
9

Do you know what does it mean?

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 70 points 1 year ago

Rich stupid guy doing things is not technology. Why is this community flooded with this guy doing or saying things?

35
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by vsis@feddit.cl to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Hello. Let's say I want to selfhost an email server (smtp + imap) that only will be used to receive email.

I only will send email internally (from my domain to my domain) and receive from 3rd parties.

Should I setup DKIM, DMARC, SPF and reverse IP lookup?

To be honest, I'm having a bit of hard time understanding the madness of email authentication. So I can't figure it out by myself if those mechanisms are needed in my case.

I haven't deployed anything, but probably will use Stalwart. It looks like it's easy to deploy. Is there any other beginner-friendly email service I should read about?

Thanks!

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 66 points 2 years ago

I also assume it's an expired certificate.

See, this is what happens when certificates are not renewed automatically.

The article says the projectos are discontinued. That's probably the reason no one is monitoring these certs.

Another glorious benefit of DRM.

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 135 points 2 years ago

Arcaeologisis: They were close friends. Roomates.

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 130 points 2 years ago

For the sake of the Fuck!

** rides into battle

1098
submitted 2 years ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[-] vsis@feddit.cl 83 points 2 years ago

There are two kind of programming languages:

  1. The ones everyone complaints about
  2. The ones nobody uses.
[-] vsis@feddit.cl 68 points 2 years ago

...until the central committee decides that more coal miners are required.

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 86 points 2 years ago

So it can be extracted again. True carbon neutrality.

813
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by vsis@feddit.cl to c/memes@lemmy.ml

edit: Don't do this. Embrace modernity and don't pollute the soil.

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 114 points 2 years ago

Kubernetes is useful if you have gone full cattle over pets. And that is very uncommon in home setups. If you only own one or two small machines you cannot destroy infra easily in a "cattle" way, and the bloatware that comes with Kubernetes doesn't help you neither.

In homelabs and home servers the pros of Kubernetes are not very useful: high availability, auto-scaling, gitops integrations, etc: Why would you need autoscaling and HA for a SFTP used only by you? Instead you write a docker-compose.yml and call it a day.

19
submitted 2 years ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://feddit.cl/post/366747

I was reading this issue from LibreWolf project when I read that some of new GitLab users were asking to give credit card information.

I had no idea this was a thing. According to the forum it's a measure to avoid bots to use free CI workers time to mine shitcoins.

53
submitted 2 years ago by vsis@feddit.cl to c/technology@lemmy.world

I was reading this issue from LibreWolf project when I read that some of new GitLab users were asking to give credit card information.

I had no idea this was a thing. According to the forum it's a measure to avoid bots to use free CI workers time to mine shitcoins.

[-] vsis@feddit.cl 67 points 2 years ago

middle aged would be around 36.

I didn't come here to be insulted.

1

Is it insecure to upload Keepass database to Google Drive, Dropbox or any other file service in the cloud?

I've read this answer in Security Stackexchange: https://security.stackexchange.com/a/45337

So, I feel kinda confident if a put a big number of PBKDF2 iterations, like 10.000.000, it should be OK.

My master password is based on diceware, but is not very very long because I need to remember it.

What do you people think about this?

view more: next ›

vsis

joined 2 years ago