72
Yeah where are those descriptions coming from? Also mentions “the strike workers’ strike” and repeats “politics” twice
Oh shit, when they said “around the corner” they really meant it
So these two provisions caught my eye; under the draft agreement, executive branch agencies (the article gives the example of the DOJ or DOD) would have the ability to (among other things)
Examine TikTok’s U.S. facilities, records, equipment and servers with minimal or no notice,
In some circumstances, require ByteDance to temporarily stop TikTok from functioning in the United States.
In the case of the former, would that include user data? Given the general US gov approach to digital privacy I assume so, and granting yourself the power to do the things you’re afraid China is doing seems appropriately ironic for us.
As far as the latter, I wonder how broadly “some circumstances” is defined. If the language is broad enough, that would open the door to de facto censorship if a certain trend or info around a certain event is spreading on the site right as the government magically decides it needs to pause TikTok due to, “uh, terrorism or something, don’t worry about it.”
I’m also curious how durable this agreement would be. How hard would it be for the next administration to decide to pitch a fit and renegotiate or throw out the deal pending a new, even harsher agreement?
It would seem to me that this is pretty nakedly an assertion of power over an entity based outside the US, and not an agreement meant to protect US citizens in any meaningful way. I think any defense of this agreement as a way to protect privacy or mental health or whatever won’t be able to honestly reconcile with the fact that these exact same concerns exist with domestic social media companies
I had this exact question myself a little while ago, so I’ll share what I learned. I don’t know your level of knowledge with these things so forgive me if I’m explaining things you already know. And spoiler alert, the answer is “technically, but not how you’d like”
An EPUB “file” is really a folder containing a bunch of individual HTML files which hold the text for the book as well as things like the table of contents, and photos (if your ebook has pictures), with CSS for styling. This is the exact medium you’d work in if you were designing a web page, but with en ebook there are different best practices and considerations.
Now assuming that your PDF has a good OCR (optical character recognition) layer, then it will be possible for calibre and other programs to grab the text of the PDF, and even to create an epub with it. But as you’ve noticed, they don’t do a good job of this. The fundamental problem is that creating an epub is something of an art, with best practices and personal choices as far as layout and file structure. When you “convert”, you’re not changing the file type from PDF to EPUB; you’re grabbing the text from the PDF and then sticking it into multiple different files, with HTML and CSS instructions throughout to tell the EReader how to lay things out, which footnotes link to which annotations, where to display pictures, etc.
As far as I’m aware, this basically can’t be done (well) with dumb, automatic programs like what Calibre offers because there’s too much “thinking” involved. Perhaps an AI tool could be created that would handle this better, but I’m not aware of one, and it’s a pretty specialised application so it’s possible you’ll need to wait a while before someone gets around to that.
So I realised that if I wanted an EPUB version, I’d need to make it myself. I used Sigil, a free EPUB creation tool, to do it, which gave me some nice features to help speed up the process, but it’s a big time commitment (unless you’re working with a very short PDF), especially for your first EPUB where you’re still learning what to do while making it. You’ll also need to learn HTML and CSS if you haven’t already.
I did it as a sort of fun side project in my free time to learn a new skill, but unfortunately other than that, I don’t think there’s such thing as an “EPUBinator” that’s gonna take your PDF and create a well-made ebook.
I’ve noticed that “gay” is used as a more general term for members of the LGBTQ+ community, similar to how “guys” has a pretty common gender-neutral usage
EDIT: tweaked the wording a bit
To add on, this exact scenario illustrates why BMI is not always the best measure of health, because it only looks at height and weight. Measuring waist circumference and body fat percentage should give you a better-rounded picture of how you’re doing
I’ll translate: “I find actions of the 1337x admins disappointing. Deleting my torrents causes confusion for the user base, and these actions reflect poorly on your character, suggesting pusillanimity and insufficient discretion when selecting a sexual partner.”
This seems like a good opportunity to point out that sunaurus pays for this instance out of pocket, and you can go to the GitHub sponsors page if you want to help financially support this instance!
Project Wingman and Subnautica can both be played entirely in VR if you’re into dogfighting or the indescribable horrors of the deep, respectively
Yeah that’s basically my view as well. I don’t take issue with posting “old news”, so long as it’s presented as such. This is good for people to know, especially TorGuard users who are unaware, but the lens people use to understand a story changes depending on whether they think it’s a new development or an old fact, so some distinction is good
This article is from March of last year, and a quick google seems to show that’s when most outlets covered this story. Am I right in seeing that this is a year-old story? The article mentioning things that happened in 2021 as “last year” caught my attention
view more: next ›
DonnieDarkmode
joined 2 years ago
Point of order; being strongly pro-Taiwan/anti CPC is as Reddit as it gets, whereas Lemmy, which was founded by Leftists booted off of Reddit (I mean it’s lemmy.ml for Marxist-Leninist, etc.) is not traditionally a place that’s going to focus on mainstream western perspectives of China.
Not even wading into the actual debate here, just figured I should note that