[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 22 hours ago

The "everyone's against us" rhetoric will only escalate with very predictable outcomes...

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

This comm is devolving into a tptb (tankie power tripping bastards), isn't it? 😅

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 4 days ago

In the campist brain, Russia is geopolitically opposed to the USA empire, and therefore since USA is the greatest evil, we need to "critically support" their opponents.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes, both parties are complicit in the state of things. This is how elections (don't) work.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago

Philanthropy has always been a way for the wealthy to whitewash themselves of the evil that made them wealthy. It's never designed to actually fix the things they broke and the lives they ruined. Look into it's history from its start with the robber barons. Look how bill gates is giving millions in philanthropy and yet "somehow" grows still more wealthy and controls immense amounts of agricultural land. It's another capitalist ploy.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 4 days ago

Musks resources could do.

That's the thing. That's an oxymoron. One can't have musks resources and be a good person. To get such resources, one has, by design, to be the kind of person who thrives in Capitalism. Evil.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago

This is for comments. Posts have a dedicated field

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

Sorry, what do you mean "saved to the image"? Alt text is a html property

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 days ago

You appear to want to continue your arguments here which is not the purpose of ytpb. Stick to discussing the mod actions themselves please.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

Lemmy has an alt text field when you upload images as the main post

722
crushing it (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
285
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The most fascinating thing about their extreme "defer to authority" attitute, is the appearance of the "angry american" phenomenon, which is just a japanese-speaking white dude employee, which is literally there to voice the staff grievances and suggestions to the boss, without anyone japanese having to lose face. Literally the reinvention of the court jester in modern times!

373
11

I've had this game on my wishlist for a while, since I saw the demo via gamingonlinux, but I haven't found the time to buy and play it yet. Found this post-mortem insteresting.

148

Hey peeps, the well-known spam problem in lemmy DMs is getting slightly worse, and the spammer in question is evolving their tactics to evade the very rudimentary options we have built-in to lemmy itself (or should I just call it,non-existent?). To get ahead of this, we deployed a DM-scanner directly in the DB, based off of this code but adjusted so that it's more difficult to pull off shenanigans.

At the moment we're only deleting messages based on the "fediverse chick" spam. However I want to point out that if for some reason you legitimately DM someone on dbzer0 with similar terms, you DM might get deleted, so do be aware about that. Them's the breaks.

Unfortunately I can't reveal the exact code I'm using atm, as this can lead to the spammer adjusting their tactics to evade it. However I plan to adjust threativore to also be able to manage your DB anti-DM-spam filters in the future, to make it much easier to handle this, even if you don't feel confident touching your DB. Stay tuned.

I do hope we get more robust anti-spam tech in lemmy and I did open two issues about this, but it seems this is not a prio atm.

If you realize that the anti-spam ate a DM. Do let us know. If you see spam getting through, also let us know.

384

Cross-posted from "Do only one dish by owning only one dish." by @cm0002@lemmy.world in !memes@lemmy.world


655
Recharging (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
812
Advice (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
318
Bug priority (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
287

Hey peeps, 2 weeks ago we opened applications to onboard new instance admins. We had a ton of great people applying and just as we were getting ready to decide, I got struck down by the influenza b and completely flattened to my bed. Welp.

Well, no matter, I'm back now and decided to announce the new peeps we're onboarding to the admin team. Initially I was planning to just add one new person, but we got so many strong applications that I felt bad choosing just one.

So without further ado, our new admins are:

  • @YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • @fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Both seem to have a history which appears to align well with our values and will provide fresh perspectives and experiences to our admin team. Peeps, feel free to introduce yourselves with as many details, pronouns, and/or fanfare as you prefer.

That out of the way, this brings our admin team to 6 members, which starts getting to the point where's the sheer amount of admins and users makes it more likely that conflict arises, either between admins, or between admins and the userbase. In most other forums, this kind of thing typically causes a closing of the ranks and/or internal purges of dissent with the site owner taking the role of the BDFL. We've seen it already with lemmy instances and the regular drama which hits meta-comms.

So, since I'm the actual owner and I hate nothing more than being a BDFL, I want to attempt something novel in this space. You see, one core concept of anarchism is instant recalls. As in, the people that represent any group for a specific project, are not representatives in the same way as in parliamentary democracy. Instead, they are there to follow the exact mandate given to them, and if they are seen as going against it, the people below them have the right to immediately recall their mandate. None of this "minimum a couple of years" and popularity contest shit which allows corruption in.

I want to attempt something similar in our instance. I don't quite know how well it's going to work, but I'm willing to give it a try. The way it's going to work, the admin team is considered to have a mandate from the userbase to do admin shit. We don't want to be calling a vote for every ban and improvement after all. However as a counter-balance, any stakeholder gets the right to initiate recall vote against any admin, including myself. The vote will be run at a 75% threshold to remove, using the governance community.

However due to the impact of such votes, the hope is that perhaps we can sort things out before it gets to it, so the expectation is that people will first open a "sense check" thread in governance to talk about it before taking it to a vote. But if things have reached a head, then a recall vote is there to check our instance admin power.

The remaining admins of course are expected to replace any removed admins to ensure the good instance operation.

I did say that you can even recall myself if you so voted, however there's indeed some hard realities we can't get around. I still control the servers and the domain, and it's not possible to enforce their management based on such votes. So I will still ultimately be able to interfere, but I promise that even if I'm removed, I will only step in to ensure the instance recall functionality is respected. Ultimately this is an experiment that I want to attempt so I'm willing to roll with whichever way it goes.

Now there's one more thing of concern, which is about someone gaming the system. This is not all set up to be super rigorous. I'm hoping our relative obscurity and super-low stakes will prevent anyone attempting to game the system. Likewise, if foul play is suspected, I am still as a failsafe to recover.

You might be asking yourselves: Why do this? Why even mess with this sort of radicalism when the BDFL approach is tried and tested. The answer is because...well, power corrupts. Having power over people does something to one's brain, mates. So many times I've seen well meaning people turn to shit because they felt they were the only ones who knew best and could protect people from themselves. I don't want that. Every BDFL approach eventually creates internal cliques, mistrust, "good ole boy clubs" and such. I base my life in trying to shed as much hierarchical power from myself as possible and it hasn't led me astray, and if we want to change this shit world we're living in, we need to try things that don't repeat the same shitty structures. So while I can't do something perfect, I'm willing to do something flawed and see how far it takes us.

So yeah, welcome the new mods and tell us what you think.

PS: We also upgraded to Lemmy 0.19.9.

65
0
Scroll duo (shellsharks.com)

Welcome to volumen duo of Scrolls, a newsletter for sharing cool stuff from the IndieWeb, Fediverse & Cybersecurity worlds[...]

view more: next ›

db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF