[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nine times out of ten, running chown on Android is an astronomically bad idea. 10 times of 10, what you're trying to do right now, is an astronomically bad idea.

What is it you are trying to do? Or rather, why?

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 2 weeks ago

this is from the google research team, they contribute a LOT to many foss projects. Google is not a monolith, each team is made of often very different folk, who have very different goals

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 weeks ago

Why People Arent Buying Sony Xperia Phones

because they are fucking expensive

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 months ago

Boring hit piece that way overblows some issues on the topic.

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 2 months ago

this is quite frankly, a really dumb picture that is wrong on many accounts

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 7 months ago

Garbage post, it's clearly trying to get development centralized again as it should be, they point to the actively developed repo

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 9 months ago

this is a really dumb take lmao

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

uses the GNOME interface

yeah thats a no from me.

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 10 months ago

The reason why firefox and chrome work so well, is that they literally have been in development for over a decade. In Firefox's case, it's actually over two decades now.

Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel, why not support some currently existing alternative browsers that look promising? You have servo, you have webkit, and you even have a ladybird now. That's three potential browsers.

All three are under somewhat active development. Servo, in my opinion, looking the most promising, that shares a lot of dependencies with Firefox still, which means maintenance cost is not super high. It's easy to hack on, and of course it's rust. ~~who doesnt love rust~~

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 11 months ago

sounds like a lot of work when you could just install arch or nobara and be done with it

[-] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

literally, all Chrome OS / chromium OS needs to do for me to actually embrace it. is native out of box flatpack support

one issue I might see them having with flatpack, is the permissions right now are handled kind of stupidly IMO. but if those get solved I think flatpack would be a great addition to chromium os ecosystem

all chromeOS needs to be immensely more useful is flatpak support, if chrome OS supported flatpaks directly, it could very well be my goto (well not chromeOS directly, probably thoriumOS) for older linux PCs for general populace

view more: next ›

drwankingstein

joined 1 year ago