1
20
2
62
submitted 19 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
3
128
4
115
submitted 1 day ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

The Delhi High Court ordered the blocking of Sci-Hub, Sci-Net, and LibGen in India on August 19, 2025, following a copyright infringement case brought by academic publishers Elsevier, Wiley, and the American Chemical Society[^5][^7].

The court found that Alexandra Elbakyan, Sci-Hub's founder, violated her December 2020 undertaking not to upload new copyrighted content by making post-2022 articles available through both Sci-Hub and a new platform called Sci-Net[^7]. While Elbakyan claimed this was due to technical errors and argued Sci-Net was a separate project, the court rejected these arguments[^7].

The ruling requires India's Department of Telecommunications and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to issue blocking orders within 72 hours, with Internet Service Providers required to implement the blocks within 24 hours[^7].

This case marks the first time Sci-Hub and LibGen faced legal action in a developing country[^2]. Earlier intervention attempts by Indian scientists and researchers had argued these platforms were "the only access to educational and research materials" for many academics in India[^2], with social science researchers specifically highlighting the "detrimental effect" blocking would have on research in India[^9].

[^2]: InfoJustice - Update on Publisher's Copyright Infringement Suit Against Sci-Hub

[^5]: Substack - GPT-4o about Sci-hub: The Delhi High Court's latest order

[^7]: SpicyIP - Sci-Hub now Completely Blocked in India!

[^9]: Internet Freedom Foundation - Social Science researchers move Delhi High Court

5
4
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
6
15
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
7
15
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
8
22
submitted 2 days ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
9
12
submitted 2 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36635080

Comments

Roadmap.
10
87
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
11
14
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
12
8
submitted 2 days ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
13
113

Microsoft has fired four employees in response to a protest over the company’s alleged ties to Israel, with two more dismissed after a break-in at President and Vice-Chair Brad Smith’s office at the company’s Redmond headquarters in Washington state, Anadolu reports.

“Two additional employees were terminated due to serious violations of established company policies and our code of conduct,” a Microsoft spokesperson told CBS News on Thursday. The company had announced the initial two firings in relation to the event on Wednesday.

Now totaling four, the firings followed a demonstration on Tuesday by seven current and former employees at the company’s Redmond headquarters in Washington state. The activists, affiliated with the group No Azure for Apartheid, entered Smith’s office to demand that Microsoft end what they described as direct and indirect support for Israel in its war on Gaza.

The No Azure for Apartheid group identified the dismissed employees on Instagram as Riki Fameli and Anna Hattle, following their arrest by police on Tuesday.

14
6
Programmer joke (lemdro.id)
submitted 2 days ago by mudkip@lemdro.id to c/technology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/28076394

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/28076393

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/28076341

"Yo mama so fat, she can sit on a binary tree and flatten it to a linked list in O(1) time"

15
17
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
16
14
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
17
28
submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
18
34
submitted 4 days ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/35349105

Aug. 26, 2025, 7:40 AM EDT
By Angela Yang, Laura Jarrett and Fallon Gallagher

[this is a truly scary incident, which shows the incredible dangers of AI without guardrails.]

19
2
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
20
8
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
21
5
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
22
36
submitted 4 days ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
23
49
submitted 5 days ago by uberstar@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Archived ver.: https://web.archive.org/web/20250828103802/https://wccftech.com/china-domestic-x86-cpu-the-zhaoxin-kx-7000-debuts-in-an-ai-pc-by-maxhub/

Original source, including in-depth tests and other fancy details of the CPU used in the MAXHUB PC itself (written in Mandarin): https://news.mydrivers.com/1/1070/1070803_all.htm

CPU-Z Single-Core Benchmark and specs from the original source:

That's an 8-core, ~3GHz Base Speed, 32MB L3 cache CPU for the number-crunchers around here.

On the surface, this CPU seems like it's best suited for general desktop and office use, to see it adopted to a PC build product geared for "AI workloads" is interesting. If I'm not mistaken, AI performance is heavily dependent on the GPU rather than on the CPU, so I think that's fine:

In terms of performance, the MAXHUB's AI+ desktop computer is claimed to play 1080P 30fps and 4K 30fps high-bitrate online videos with decent CPU utilization numbers, showing that the KX-7000 CPU acts decently with media workload. Of course, when compared against competitors like Intel or AMD, Zhaoxin is behind, but the key motive here to create an ecosystem that relies entirely on in-house products, and this has apparently happened here.

And that's a good thing, lol.

24
11
submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
25
42

Nvidia recorded no China sales revenue for H20 chips and reported revenue that narrowly beat Wall Street targets in the second quarter, as the AI chipmaker reported financial results on Wednesday.

Nvidia has been navigating trade restrictions on H20 shipments to China since April. The U.S. government began issuing licenses for approved buyers in China in July, and Nvidia said a few of its China-based customers had received such licenses. But no H20 chip revenue to China was included in its second-quarter revenue, Nvidia said (It noted that some H20 chip inventory was sold outside of China in the second quarter, adding a $180 million benefit to the topline).

Nvidia said it was not including H20 in its financial forecast for the current quarter, though it estimated that $2 billion to $5 billion worth of H20 chips could be shipped to China if “geopolitical” issues were resolved. The company also repeated its call for the U.S. government to allow it to sell its more advanced “Blackwell” generation of products to China.

view more: next ›

Technology

39586 readers
241 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS