41
submitted 1 day ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/palestine@lemmy.ml

Stephen Starr in Hamtramck, Michigan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 11.00 EDT

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

"will vote against Harris" (read: for trump, because that is how our trash elections work) "Neither side will do the right thing on the genocide...so we will elect the one with the worst position and get a bonus of bringing about all manner of horrible outcomes here at home too!"

Alrighty, it's your vote. MAGA uses it to make emotionally driven decisions based on ignorance for outcomes that hurt themselves and those around them, it is fair to let these well-meaning clowns join them in that. Our very own blueMAGA. I hope you lose in a mind-shattering crushing defeat, and then Kamala proves you all wrong. I have my doubts on the last bit, but if y'all can be stupid enough to vote for trump, I can be the same to hope for unlikely change (with the benefit of not also supporting suffering here too).

👍

[-] shaserlark@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Well idk how Harris can possibly think that videos of her being “slay” and “brat” will fool people who are against genocide into siding with her. It’s very fucked up and Trump is going to be much worse for domestic politics, but I think at this point Arabs have nothing to lose. Also I don’t think many of them would for Trump, they’d rather vote third party or not at all.

Seeing yourself dehumanized on a daily basis by the current administration I wouldn’t give a shit either. They have already shown what they stand for and they promised to continue. If the dems lose against Trump, it’s their own fault. They know what to do, they need to stop the genocide, but they won’t and Arab voters see that.

Trump is gonna suck but that dipshit only cares about money and personal flattery, which adds the element of unpredictability. He’s mostly likely going to be even worse than Biden because he won’t give a shit about Palestinians, but any random shit could happen that makes him do a u-turn. I don’t think it’s likely but it’s the only good thing I could see coming out of this.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

the stark contrast between the .world version of this post and this one makes me doubt that the lemmyverse has any stamina.

[-] pete_link@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

You mean the reaction (downvotes) in the .world instances, right?

I think the contrast reflects the real diversity of opinions, and not lack of stamina. Of course I am disappointed with the downvotes and the hostile comments to anything that might oppose Harris. But the level of discourse in Lemmy is a lot better than Twitter, FB, etc.

So I'm going to keep posting these to as many communities as I can. :-)

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

It's becoming multipolar, with right-wingers on the Lemmy.world side and left wingers on the Lemmy.ml side, and the various instances aligned with each and neither. The Lemmy.world moderators are also Zionists that allow hasbara but censor comments that show the complicity of the Democrats in genocide as "misinformation."

[-] shaserlark@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree that .world is problematic especially that Zionist “bias” checker bot and their tolerance of hasbara comments & genocide denial. But also I got banned for “racism” at !worldnews@lemmy.ml for saying China is committing genocide against the Uyghurs…

[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Because Trump is so likely to be a better choice for solving the Israel-Gaza crisis, lol.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Nobody said that, neither choice is going to solve it so it's better to abandon both if genocide is a red line for you.

[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago

Aha, so just don't participate. Cool cool.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 19 hours ago

I'm all on-board with revolution.

[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

What's the plan, my friend? How do you plan to fight against knife-missiles?

[-] simplymath@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

There are currently armed militias targeting bureaucrats for violence due to Republican misinformation. How many more escalations really remain before a full-blown civil war?

I'm not advocating for revolution, but it certainly seems more likely than the Democrats dropping their unwavering support for Israel.

[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

There have always been armed militias targeting the federal government. You know who those armed militias support for President? You know which candidate would welcome those armed militias?

[-] simplymath@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

I don't disagree, homey. Seems like the militias are going to be a growing problem regardless of the election. What we disagree on here is the solution.

For me, the solution is for the Dems to call the genocide what it is and force a ceasefire.

I'm not judging people for pulling the only lever the US system gives them. I don't advocate for voting for Trump and don't recommend anyone does, but I do understand how some people might choose to vote against the people who are currently bombing them with the hope that the only other option won't.

[-] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 3 points 17 hours ago

If Trump wins, there will certainly be a revolution. But probably not the kind you’re looking for.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago

I don't think continuation of the ever-worsening status quo counts as a revolution

[-] simplymath@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Who the fuck said anything about Trump? Not sure why you think people dying from American bombs give a fuck about who sent them.

Can you crawl out of your narrow worldview for just a second and recognize that real people are experiencing a real genocide?

That's not some Russian propaganda spin either, but recognized by the ICJ.

[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

Who the fuck said I don't believe there's a genocide going on?

[-] simplymath@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

calling it the "Israel-Gaza crisis" implies equivalence. As somebody else notes, not using the word genocide is also a strong signal that you don't believe it's a genocide. Finally, you'll used "lol" when talking about a genocide. In short, all evidence in your message suggests that you do not take it seriously.

If the point of your comment isn't to minimize suffering and mock people for their political choice, then what is the point of your comment?

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

I agree there's a horrific genocide taking place, aided by the USA, and all Americans should be ashamed of this. But to be fair, the headline indicates these voters will vote against Harris. Either that's a vote for Trump or a vote for a third party. Either way it increases trump's likelihood of being elected.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 6 points 20 hours ago

Democrats chose this hill to die on, not the voters.

You know what it’s called when voters aren’t allowed to vote for the candidate they desire?

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

No, it's the voters. You can't just forever blame your garbage decisions on other people.

[-] simplymath@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ok? There's a simple solution here for the democrats.

Let's not engage in victim blaming here and recognize who has power to end this and who is exercising their right to express their profound and utter disappointment in a political system that is, at best, ambivalent to their suffering.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

When you can't even call it a genocide of Gazans by Israel you should rethink whether you should even comment.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

Good thing no one is making that argument then.

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

The existence of this post is the embodiment of that argument you clown

[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml -1 points 19 hours ago
[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 2 points 16 hours ago

So you're saying some people are making that argument? Who are they?

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
41 points (77.3% liked)

Palestine

757 readers
278 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS