79
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by JoeBidet@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

By Albert Burneko

9:00 AM EDT on September 11, 2024

Mars does not have a magnetosphere. Any discussion of humans ever settling the red planet can stop right there, but of course it never does. Do you have a low-cost plan for, uh, creating a gigantic active dynamo at Mars's dead core? No? Well. It's fine. I'm sure you have some other workable, sustainable plan for shielding live Mars inhabitants from deadly solar and cosmic radiation, forever. No? Huh. Well then let's discuss something else equally realistic, like your plan to build a condo complex in Middle Earth.

...

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 49 points 11 months ago

a couple of things they got right about uthe future:

  • sitting alone in a bubble
  • depending on over-architectured machines
  • having the illusion to connect to others while only looking at them through something
[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago
[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In last 5 years for me:

  • a pair of decent (second hand) speakers
  • a cheap (blue switches ftw) mechanical keyboard
  • a standing desk
  • an ergonomic chair

(sorry it's not single item...)

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago

I think it should always add:

"I am sorry*, Dave,* but i cannot .... "

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

as said before: backup first. the rest afterwards...

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The thing I find hard to convey is that FLOSS software is superior to proprietary software for many reasons, most of which are non-technical: FLOSS software is superior to proprietary software if it isn't spying on you, if it's governance is collective, if it's not build to make you pay for things that should be free, if it lets you decide where your data goes, etc...

we're often missing the point when we attempt at side-by-side comparison of FLOSS and proprietary software.. It's usually one-dimentional, and playing on our opponent's field: these companies racketing their users based on rent-based exploitative business models will always have more resources than independant developpers to improve "UX/UI"... so I think this must not be the only prism through which reading these things.

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 year ago
[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

archive.org has a flourish of ROMsets for old machines!

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 year ago

All culture belongs to everyone, therefore should be accessible to everyone.

The sale of goods only concerns those who can and want to afford it.

Sharing is not theft.

Pirates are cool.

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

wait. unlimited access to healthcare? isn't it "communism" when you're not a retired killer-machine over there?

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Can anyone point to the source code please? They claim it is "privacy friendly", so it cannot be proprietary, right? right? right?

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

What are the challenges posed by moderation (and admin in general) that you didn't think of when launching the first instance?

(and: How can things get improved, how can people help?)

2
submitted 1 year ago by JoeBidet@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

#FreeAssange!

2
submitted 1 year ago by JoeBidet@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
3
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by JoeBidet@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

A British judge has ordered the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to the United States, where he faces a 175-year sentence. The final decision on Assange’s extradition will now be made by U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel. Amnesty International’s Simon Crowther spoke outside the courthouse prior to today’s ruling.

Simon Crowther: “Julian Assange is being prosecuted for espionage for publishing sensitive material that was classified. And if he is extradited to the U.S. for this, all journalists around the world are going to have to look over their shoulder, because within their own jurisdiction, if they publish something that the U.S. considers to be classified, they will face the risk of being extradited.”

0
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by JoeBidet@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

UK Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal in Assange extradition. The case now moves to UK Home Secretary Priti Patel to authorize the extradition.

WikiLeaks editor and publisher Julian Assange is facing a 175 year sentence for publishing truthful information in the public interest.

Julian Assange is being sought by the current US administration for publishing US government documents which exposed war crimes and human rights abuses. The politically motivated charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom and the public’s right to know – seeking to criminalise basic journalistic activity.

If convicted Julian Assange faces a sentence of 175 years, likely to be spent in extreme isolation.

The UN working group on arbitrary detention issued a statement saying that “the right of Mr. Assange to personal liberty should be restored”.

Massimo Moratti of Amnesty International has publicly stated on their website that, “Were Julian Assange to be extradited or subjected to any other transfer to the USA, Britain would be in breach of its obligations under international law.

Human Rights Watch published an article saying, “The only thing standing between an Assange prosecution and a major threat to global media freedom is Britain. It is urgent that it defend the principles at risk.”

The NUJ has stated that the “US charges against Assange pose a huge threat, one that could criminalise the critical work of investigative journalists & their ability to protect their sources”.

view more: next ›

JoeBidet

joined 3 years ago