32
77
submitted 3 days ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

obligatory xkcd#37 link

22
submitted 4 days ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/goodnews@lemmy.ml
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

this guy knuths how units work

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago
39
276
7
submitted 1 week ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
34
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
38
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
60
submitted 2 weeks ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
14
submitted 3 weeks ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
84
submitted 3 weeks ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
23
submitted 1 month ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 192 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, SVG files are not HTML.

~~Please change this post title (currently "today i learned: svg files are literally just html code"), to avoid spreading this incorrect factoid!~~

~~I suggest you change it to "today i learned: svg files are just text in an html-like language" or something like that.~~ edit: thanks OP

SVG is a dialect of XML.

XML and HTML have many similarities, because they both are descendants of SGML. But, as others have noted in this thread, HTML is also not XML. (Except for when it's XHTML...)

Like HTML, SVG also can use CSS, and, in some environments (eg, in browsers, but not in Inkscape) also JavaScript. But, the styles you can specify with CSS in SVG are quite different than those you can specify with CSS in HTML.

Lastly, you can embed SVG in HTML and it will work in (modern) browsers. You cannot embed HTML in SVG, however.

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 113 points 8 months ago

Ads?! in Ubuntu? Never! They were simply "integrating online scope results into the home lens of the dash" 🤡

(that is an actual quote from the sentence immediately following "We’re not putting ads in Ubuntu" in Mark Shuttleworth's blog post responding to the entirely predictable backlash after they did this, twelve years ago...)

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 118 points 10 months ago

this isn’t remotely how this meme is used lol

"Robin Holding a Whiteboard" meme format with left column labeled "people who use this meme format correctly" and a tally of one, and the right column labeled "people who use this format like glasses dog" and a tally of 21

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 128 points 11 months ago

shoutout to the person who reported this post with "Reason: Bot meme, you can't even read it. whoever replies is a bot too" 😂

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 175 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 140 points 2 years ago

the famous "This incident will be reported" error was briefly removed last year before being replaced with a less ominous version.

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 124 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm disappointed in arstechnica for only supporting their provocative headline (Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine) with this vagueness in the article:

While Cavanaugh delivered his opening statement, Mehta even appeared briefly confused by some of the references to today's tech, unable to keep straight if Mozilla was a browser or a search engine. He also appeared unclear about how SEM works and struggled to understand the options for Microsoft to promote Bing ads outside of Google's SEM tools.

What did he actually say?!

view more: next ›

cypherpunks

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF