the initial argument only applies to Utopian Socialism anyway – fighting for your personal interest is exactly the point of communism, destroying all the enemies of the working class
You cut off the recipe, this is useless to me.
How much general legitimacy does the regime have there? Do people not want to overthrow/replace it by this point?
What do you mean by physical proof?
Some history is known by digging up physical stones n bones. Some is known by digging up texts.
There are multiple texts dated to the 1st century that all corroborate the story that a person called Jesus was crucified around 33AD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_for_the_historicity_of_Jesus
Story didn't go anywhere
American cars aren't good, everybody knows that.
Are these screenshots fake or are search engines saying stuff like this? (I don't use google)
The existence of Harambe implies the existence of Halalbe
The fediverse really needs key-signed messages.
As long as accounts reside on one server it fails to accomplish its goals, IMO
Capitalism breeds innovation
It's UN 37/43, adopted 3 December 1982:
"reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle."
I thiiink this is why Northern Irish groups like to use the phrase "armed struggle", https://archive.org/details/armedstrugglehis00engl
and, conversely, posting things you have "verified"
"You're wrong! I was able to prove it with a quick Google!"
Your knowledge coming from a 'quick google' isn't the flex you think it is. Most things that can be proven with a quick google are false.