I took notes for the benefit of anyone who doesn’t like their info in video form.
I love you.
I took notes for the benefit of anyone who doesn’t like their info in video form.
I love you.
Kensington? I don't think an air tag can actually prevent theft (if they see it they'll remove it - if they don't see it they'll still steal your stuff)
But it has no ads
Reading https://codeberg.org/river/river/src/branch/master/protocol/river-layout-v3.xml it seems to me that what I want to do is actually not possible in river, even writing a custom layout manager...
IIUC the protocol works like this: river asks "how should I layout N windows in HxW screen?" and the layout replies "window1: H1xW1 at offset X1,Y1; window2: H2xW2 ...", so there is no way for the layout manager to identify specific windows and, in my use case, put all the text editors on the left side of the screen etc.
Did you have some other approach in mind when you suggested river? (I may very well be over-complicating things and not seeing a more straightforward solution)
TBH I really liked the idea behind river, but does it have tabs? Also... I would need to write my own custom layout, wouldn't I?
BTW: are there other WMs that are modular like river?
Sorry to be a bother, but... how do I tell hyprland I want a window to be added to a specific group?
I was thinking of something like:
windowrulev2 = tag texteditor, class:(myfirsteditor)
windowrulev2 = tag texteditor, class:(mysecondeditor)
windowrulev2 = group XXX, tag:texteditor
but I can't find what I should write instead of group XXX
to tell hyprland/hy3 that I want the window to be added to a group on the left-side of workspace 1...
I would also be fine with some rule that could be added to exec
or probably even some dispatcher, but I can't find anything that allows to target (or define) a specific group.
Am I pursuing this from the wrong direction?
User: "I have to waste my whole life fixing this" Dev: "you are complaining that you have to spend a few minutes"
Savage.
To me, saying "wayland breaks things" is putting it backwards: at this point, it should be "[thing] still doesn't work on wayland".
Death warrant? Maybe, but I expect companies (maybe not the EU, but - let's be frank - probably the EU too) to go back into X as soon as they feel they are done cashing in this virtue signaling.
There were plenty of reasons to leave twitter before this idiotic tweet from Musk (reasons due to twitter's action as a company, and not just Musk's drunken posts) and they were all happily tweeting and advertising.
Is this drop that breaks the camel's back? Maybe, but I wouldn't be holding my breath.
Didn't you know? Disabling ad blockers ensures free speech and apparently may also peacefully end the current crisis in the middle east... oh, did I mention it helps with world hunger too?
He said “Well thats what it says in the textbook so I have to mark it wrong”
The mark of a great teacher. It's nice however that he had the patience to wait for your experiment (or maybe he was expecting it to fail miserably?): no prof of mine would have went along with something like that (not to mention, I'm pretty sure we couldn't take apart the lab PCs at our leisure).
It's not only possible, it's easy: you just need terrible labor and environmental standards, poor welfare, cheap access to raw materials, and tons of state subsidies :)
It's interesting to note that "we" knew all along it would end like this but just couldn't resist moving/outsourcing production to China nor investing in China's fast-growing economy.
"We" were chasing short-term profits and China was playing the long game. Apparently, both parties won, each at their own game.
The cost of batteries is (relatively) higher for cheap vehicles, so that's the segment where it makes the most difference.