Reading this with Tridactyl, a browser add-on to bring Vim bindings to the Web.
Bonus : edited this TextArea in Vim itself via Ctrl-i
Because software is easier to analyze than hardware?
I can think of plenty of reasons, e.g. NSA, or any US institution interested in intelligence gathering, paying for it.
I can though, at the same time, imagine that Apple itself would still NOT want to do it, neither in software or hardware, because once discovered (not when) their economical value would crater.
The market value of Apple is totally different from alternatives, e.g. Chinese companies, as you mention, but also Microsoft or Google. Yes, they ALL sell vertical integration of software and hardware BUT everybody expects Google or Meta to "steal" your data. Most people expect Chinese companies to do the same. Most people understand that Microsoft do it because it's profitable so they follow their footstep.
Everybody who knows this is buying Apple for the prestige AND because they are "different". Namely you are "hip" by buying from them because they are NOT Google subsidizing hardware for privacy, Xioami or anything Android because it's the same but "cheap" or Microsoft because it's what one uses at work.
So... if tomorrow Apple is not "cool" anymore, that's actually a very big deal for the bottom line IMHO.
They might be tempted to do so, regardless of how genuine the "culture" of the corporation is, but even if one were to care solely for money, their image is deeply intertwine now with the notion that at least if you buy some fancy Apple device they'll work and nothing with leak.
That's why economical, not technical, bet on how I have a hard time imagining a hardware backdoor.
Sorry to say but looks like you are investing a ton of resources for a behavior that is not very healthy.
I know it's tempting to go back but ponder why though.
Lemmy isn't perfect but maybe we can help do better, be better?
Scam and grift at unreal scale. Sad and worried but not even surprised. Altman is literally doing the exact opposite he promised from the start. It's not about safety, it's all about money and power.
I wouldn't build anything significant on the RPi Zero and instead would try to build elsewhere, namely on a more powerful machine with the same architecture, or cross-build as others suggested.
That being said, what's interesting IMHO with container image building is that you can rely on layers. So... my advice would be to find the existing image supported by your architecture then rely on it to layer on top of it. This way you only build on the RPi what is truly not available elsewhere.
doubt Apple is doing anything beyond the software level.
Why though? They are designing the most complex part of the computer, the M* chip, so they definitely have the technical and production capability to do whatever they want with the hardware. I'm not saying they do though but they could if they wanted to. That being said however they do it, they would still have to transmit whatever data being captured with interroperable means, i.e over the Internet (being over BT relayed to another device, WiFi, Ethernet, etc) which then in turn could be spotted with any network traffic analysis tool. A single instance of this would bring their entire goodwill and thus probably business to the ground though.
So... I'm not saying one has any reason to worry but also claiming they don't do anything beyond software is strange to me.
Absolutely, but OP will have to explain a bit to their boss why. Maybe we can help OP there?
Fuck that walled garden is not a business value added task so can we, as a community who cares how openness, translate that to C-suite MBA speech?
Maybe Ubuntu, RedHat, and other company selling FLOSS have reports to help there.
This is nearly 20 years old but give the idea of the words needed https://www.cio.com/article/274764/operating-systems-the-tco-of-operating-systems-compare-the-big-oses.html
Here is something a bit more recent https://umatechnology.org/comparing-operating-system-costs-windows-macos-linux/ but again this isn't to give an "answer" but at least understanding management perspective, which is not really a technical one but rather a cost/value one.
Mine, we're one in it, me ;)
Interesting, thanks for sharing the use cases and clarifying your choices.
I do also have a standing desk with a relatively large screen on a monitor arm. I also have a walking pad under the standing desk. The goal being to ergonomically have as much freedom as possible while still being efficient.
I did try the XReal months ago but I don't think I tried the Pro.
Otherwise I worked with pretty much everything (Google Glass, HoloLens, Vision Pro, Quest (all models), Lynx XR1, Monocle/Frames, my own DIY ones, etc) but my main focus is WebXR and 6DoF, so not really replacing a screen. I do understand it is useful, and sometimes as I travel I use the Quest 3 or Vision Pro to work in there but that's typically a temporary measure. My professional perspective is that 6DoF with hand tracking and accessories (6DoF pens, BT keyboard, etc) is the most novel way to interact with information hence why I build open-source WebXR prototypes on that topic.
Didn't watch the video... but the premise "The biggest barrier for the new Linux user isn't the installer" is exactly why Microsoft is, sadly, dominating the end-user (not servers) market.
What Microsoft managed to do with OEMs is NOT to have an installer at all! People buy (or get, via their work) a computer and... use it. There is not installation step for the vast majority of people.
I'm not saying that's good, only that strategy wise, if the single metric is adoption rate, no installer is a winning strategy.
What's driving me nuts is that people will focus on the glasses.
Yes, the glasses ARE a problem because Meta, despite being warned by experts like AccessNow to SHOW when a camera is recording, you know with a bright red LED as it's been the case with others devices before, kept it "stealthy" because it's... cool I guess?
Anyway, the glasses themselves are but the tip of the iceberg. They are the end of the surveillance apparatus that people WILLINGLY decide to contribute to. What do I mean? Well that people who are "shocked" by this kind of demonstrations (because that's what it is, not actual revelations) will be whining about it on Thread or X after sending a WhatsApp message to their friends and sending GMail to someone else on their Google, I mean Android, phone and testing the latest version of ChatGPT. Maybe the worst part in all this? They paid to get a Google Nest inside their home and an Amazon Ring video doorbell outside. They ARE part of the surveillance.
Those people are FUELING surveillance capitalism by pouring their private data to large corporations earning money on their usage.
Come on... be shocked yes, be horrified yes, but don't pretend that you are not part of the problem. You ARE wearing those "glasses" in other form daily, you are paying for it with money and usage. Stop and buy actual products, software and hardware, from companies who do not make money with ads, directly or indirectly. Make sure the products you use do NOT rely on "the cloud" and siphon all your data elsewhere, for profit. Change today.
I agree and I think games are a good example, especially with the Cloud Gaming trend that is trying to apply the same model from video streaming including both the advantages (to be fair, in particular instantaneous start, in theory) but also huge disadvantages (privacy, connectivity needed, no sovereignty, price increase, etc).